Jon Stewart will return to 'The Daily Show' as its Monday host and executive producer. Show correspondents will host other nights of the week

After scuttling a months-long search for a new host, the Paramount Global network said it had enlisted Jon Stewart, who presided over the late-night mainstay’s most popular era, to serve as its host on Monday nights throughout the 2024 election cycle and to run the program. He is expected to oversee the program through 2025. Various “Daily Show” correspondents will host the program Tuesday through Thursday nights, and Jen Flanz, the current executive producer, will continue her duties on the show.

  • Potatos_are_not_friends@lemmy.world
    301·
    11 months ago

    Does Jon even want the job? It sucks. You have to deal with so many roadblocks. You get blamed for everything. You pitch ideas and make demands and some shithead dept will block you and some company throws billions to turn the public against you.

    Unless he finds loopholes like Trump and load it up with toadies willing to bow to the king, which I doubt Stewart wants to abuse because he has ethics, it’ll be hard to get much of the government on his side.

    Even basic shit like feeding school kids is a fucking political theater by assholes.

    • Traegert@lemm.ee
      321·
      11 months ago

      He doesn’t want the job. That’s kinda the point. We could use someone who doesn’t WANT the job but does it anyway.

        • ikidd@lemmy.worldEnglish
          133·
          11 months ago

          Make it like jury duty. You get 4 years in the hotseat then it’s on to something else. Imagine the diversity of experience, good and bad. You can’t lead a committee that has anything to do with your civilian career.

          • el_eh_chase@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            6·
            11 months ago

            That would be in the same spirit as the system of government in ancient Athens. Common people being chosen by lottery to have a seat in governement. From the little I know on the subject, I always thought it seemed like a really solid democratic system.

            • 24_at_the_withers@lemmy.world
              2·
              11 months ago

              DENNIS: Oh king, eh, very nice. An’ how’d you get that, eh? By exploitin’ the workers – by ‘angin’ on to outdated imperialist dogma which perpetuates the economic an’ social differences in our society! If there’s ever going to be any progress–

              WOMAN: Dennis, there’s some lovely filth down here. Oh – how d’you do?

              ARTHUR: How do you do, good lady. I am Arthur, King of the Britons. Whose castle is that?

              WOMAN: King of the who?

              ARTHUR: The Britons.

              WOMAN: Who are the Britons?

              ARTHUR: Well, we all are. we’re all Britons and I am your king.

              WOMAN: I didn’t know we had a king. I thought we were an autonomous collective.

              DENNIS: You’re fooling yourself. We’re living in a dictatorship. A self-perpetuating autocracy in which the working classes–

              WOMAN: Oh there you go, bringing class into it again.

              DENNIS: That’s what it’s all about if only people would–

              ARTHUR: Please, please good people. I am in haste. Who lives in that castle?

              WOMAN: No one live there.

              ARTHUR: Then who is your lord?

              WOMAN: We don’t have a lord.

              ARTHUR: What?

              DENNIS: I told you. We’re an anarcho-syndicalist commune. We take it in turns to act as a sort of executive officer for the week.

              ARTHUR: Yes.

              DENNIS: But all the decision of that officer have to be ratified at a special biweekly meeting.

              ARTHUR: Yes, I see.

              DENNIS: By a simple majority in the case of purely internal affairs,–

              ARTHUR: Be quiet! DENNIS: –but by a two-thirds majority in the case of more–

              ARTHUR: Be quiet! I order you to be quiet!