renzev@lemmy.world to memes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 10 months agoYou do know you can just click the "reject all" button, right?lemmy.worldimagemessage-square77fedilinkarrow-up1654arrow-down150file-text
arrow-up1604arrow-down1imageYou do know you can just click the "reject all" button, right?lemmy.worldrenzev@lemmy.world to memes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 10 months agomessage-square77fedilinkfile-text
Context: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fqhPUmyrfGI Without ads/tracking: https://www.yewtu.be/watch?v=fqhPUmyrfGI
minus-squareMonkderZweite@feddit.chlinkfedilinkarrow-up11·edit-210 months agoToS are not law. https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2010/07/court-violating-terms-service-not-crime-bypassing
minus-squarephoneymouse@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·10 months agoThey are a contract. Courts have increasingly sided with corporations on making consent be implied and also allowing corporations to pretty much change the terms and conditions at will.
minus-squaresuperbirra@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down3·10 months agoin the context of what yt enforce on their shit, yes they are law
minus-square🐑🇸 🇭 🇪 🇪 🇵 🇱 🇪🐑@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down2·10 months agodeleted by creator
minus-squaresuperbirra@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·10 months agotbh I don’t care so much, I was just observing the stupidity of the reply :P
ToS are not law.
https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2010/07/court-violating-terms-service-not-crime-bypassing
They are a contract. Courts have increasingly sided with corporations on making consent be implied and also allowing corporations to pretty much change the terms and conditions at will.
in the context of what yt enforce on their shit, yes they are law
deleted by creator
tbh I don’t care so much, I was just observing the stupidity of the reply :P