I thought of this recently (anti llm content within)

The reason a lot of companies/people are obsessed with llms and the like, is that it can solve some of their problems (so they think). The thing I noticed, is a LOT of the things they try to force the LLM to fix, could be solved with relatively simple programming.

Things like better searches (seo destroyed this by design, and kagi is about the only usable search engine with easy access), organization (use a database), document management, etc.

People dont fully understand how it all works, so they try to shoehorn the llm to do the work for them (poorly), while learning nothing of value.

  • HelloRoot@lemy.lol
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    LLMs are great. You can tell them a problem with words and they figure out what you mean and solve it. You can not ignore the value of it for normal people.

    Some recent examples for me:


    I was playing a factory building game and didn’t want to do a spreadsheet by hand for figuring out the optimal amount of which building I have to place to get a wanted output. I told the LLM, copy pasted the wiki for each building. It did some differential equasions and gave me a result and a spreadsheet all in under a minute.

    I had to do some math, without knowing the underlying concepts. Describing the situation and problem and giving it all known values was much easier than reading 5 wikipedia articles, figuring out how to break it down, which formulas to use for each step and how to chain them all.

    I recently googled for half an hour, crawling through shit articles, reading 50page PDFs, none of which contained the detail I wanted, before giving up asking an AI and clicking on the source it quoted to get my reply. Maybe my search terms sucked, maybe I can’t ask the right question, because I don’t know what I don’t know, but the LLM was able to get it.


    Are the problems I described already “solved” more computationally efficiently by other means? Absolutely yes!

    Will it be faster and easier for me to throw it at an LLM? Also yes!

    • 🇰 🌀 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 🇮 @pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      5 days ago

      And how do you know that the LLM was accurate and gave you the correct information, instead of just making up something entirely novel and telling you what you wanted to hear? Maybe the detail you were searching for could not be found, because it did not actually exist.

      • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        5 days ago

        Maybe the detail you were searching for could not be found, because it did not actually exist.

        He said he clicked the source it quoted.

        Maybe if Google hasn’t been enshittifying search for 10 years, AI search wouldn’t be useful. But I’ve seen the same thing. The forced Gemini summary at the top of Google often has source links that aren’t anywhere on the first page of Google itself.

      • HelloRoot@lemy.lol
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        5 days ago

        First, read my text fully before replying.

        But additionally I have a brain and can use it to double check:

        In example 1. I just build it blindly because it’s a game and it doesn’t matter if it’s wrong. But it ended up being correct and I ended up having more fun instead of doing excel for an hour.

        In 2. the math result was not far off from my guesstimate and I confirmed later, it was correct.

        In 3. it gave me a source and I read the source. Google did not lead me to that source.

        When I let LLM write code, I read the code, then I test the code. Here is where I get the most faults. Not in spreadsheets or math or research.

        • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          5 days ago

          It’s weird how there is such a knee jerk hate for a turbo charged word predictor. You’d think there would have been similar mouth frothing at on screen keyboards predicting words.

          I see it as a tool that helps sometimes. It’s like an electric drill and craftsmen are screaming, “BUT YOU COULD DRILL OFF CENTER!!!”

          • jasory@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            5 days ago

            The commenter more or less admitted that they have no way of knowing that the algorithm is actually correct.

            In your first analogy it would be like if text predictors pulled words from a thesaurus instead of a list of common words.

            • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              5 days ago

              that they have no way of knowing that the algorithm is actually correct.

              He tested it and it was good enough for him. If he wrote the code he’d still not know if it was correct and need to test it. If knowing an algorithm was all that was needed for writing working code, there wouldn’t have been any software bugs in all of computer history until AI.

              text predictors pulled words

              My phone keyboard text predictor lists 3 words and they’re frequently wrong. At best it lists 3 and you have to choose the 1 right word.

    • bridgeenjoyer@sh.itjust.worksOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 days ago

      Its a good tool in some cases. But I think general lack of understanding of how it works and its shortcomings is going to cause many issues in coming years.

      • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 days ago

        That’s been true ever since the first graduates came out knowing COBOL instead of assembly. Everything keeps getting more bloated and buggy.

        • bridgeenjoyer@sh.itjust.worksOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 days ago

          I wish I could go back and learn all the old ways, but no one teaches that now. I hate learning things the new way with all the shortcuts and bloat everything has now

          • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 days ago

            There are lots of assembly programming YouTubers. My way of scratching that itch is Arduino / ESP32. The tool chain is all C code but it’s so stripped down there’s not even an OS. It’s just your code on the hardware.

            • bridgeenjoyer@sh.itjust.worksOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              6 hours ago

              I do love the little arduinos and pis, but I can’t think of any application I’d need one for.

              Also is just kind of a bummer since ai can do all the coding, there’s not much purpose in me learning it all from scratch. Back in the day, you HAD to learn that way, and I much prefer that. Everything is much too easy now and I think humanity is going to see the result of that in 15 years with the up and coming generation.

            • bridgeenjoyer@sh.itjust.worksOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              6 hours ago

              I do love the little arduinos and pis, but I can’t think of any application I’d need one for.

              Also is just kind of a bummer since ai can do all the coding, there’s not much purpose in me learning it all from scratch. Back in the day, you HAD to learn that way, and I much prefer that. Everything is much too easy now and I think humanity is going to see the result of that in 15 years with the up and coming generation.