• 1984@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    People really should use multi factor auth on important sites they rely on…

    • MDKAOD@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Ya know, I have no issues with 2fa, but I watch older folks struggle with it for some reason. They can’t fathom the ‘magic’. But I don’t understand 2fa on utility websites that are only payment portals that obfuscate account numbers. Like “enable 2fa for account security!” why? Because someone who has found my credentials on the dark web might pay my bill?

      • Lesrid@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        I’m also trying to find the angle on it. Like with my ISP I guess someone could have my password but not necessarily my address? So from the ISP site they could peek at my address??? I’m not even sure it has my address unobfuscated but I figure it must somewhere, like “view this bill”.

        • brianorca@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          A lot of ISPs provide email, too. So getting an ISP password lets them reset your other passwords which used that email address for the “forgot password” prompt. (I’m guessing you don’t use your ISP provided email, but you’re not “most people”.)

    • KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      As long as that factor is auth app based, and not email/text/call/proprietary app I’m all in. If I need to go digging for the second factor for 5 minutes, I’m almost always going to turn it off. Texts emails and calls all get delayed regularly, and it’s super fun to have to sit with my thumb up my ass waiting 10 minutes for an OTP that was good for 5.

      • 1984@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        10 months ago

        I think for email it’s essential, it’s critical that someone doesn’t make it into your email. Otherwise they can reset all your other passwords.

        I have mfa on my account but I just click a checkbox after first time to not ask again. I’m still protected by it and don’t have to do anything until I clear my cookies (which I don’t for email).

        • Scolding7300@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          I think they’re thinking of TOTP noy being the standard, where you’d just pull out your totp app and paste it without waiting

          • KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            10 months ago

            Precisely, my brain just completely forgot the term for it and after minutes of not being able to remember for the list of my I just loosely described it. TOTP is exactly what I meant.

      • stealth_cookies@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        10 months ago

        Ideally they also support a hardware key. Not nearly enough websites out there support FIDO/Webauthn.

      • Akuchimoya@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        One time I had to use a website where the email 2FA expired in 30 seconds! I usually keep my email client open while my computer is on, but, come on, that was ridiculous.

        • KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          10 months ago

          That’s also a less secure version of 2fa. Granted, it is still better than nothing, but sim spoofing is still a thing that happens regularly. Making it much less useful in a targeted attack.

            • KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              10 months ago

              A smartphone is infinitely more secure than relying on a SIM card not being compromised. A little social engineering can get you access to receive a text as the link isn’t even controlled by you but a third party. An app on your phone is likely secured by a pin/biometric, and a password/pin/biometric, both controlled by you.

              • HubertManne@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                10 months ago

                yup. if you have or care to have a smartphone. having a smartphone or even a cell phone should not be some sort of requirement live in society.

                • KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  10 months ago

                  Oh cmon, you can get a smartphone literally for free these days. And yes, having a cell phone of some type is pretty much a requirement to live in the 23rd century. Even if you are just communicating over free McDonalds wifi (no shame, been there done that) you pretty much need a smart phone in the modern world.