I’ve been impressed by my Ulefone 27T. It’s an armoured brick with a 10,000mAh battery. Waterproof, with IR and headphone jack. It also has a thermal camera.
Across the board, in product survey after product survey, consumers agree with you every time about thin phones. At best nobody cares beyond being briefly conceptually impressed (in a way that doesn’t translate into sales), at worst people actively hate how fragile it looks (or actually is). They always would rather have more battery life than a thinner phone, and actually below a certain weight most consumers prefer a phone to be heavier.
So why do companies keep racing to make the thinnest phones?
I honestly have no idea. This isn’t one of those things where I pose a rhetorical question and then answer it. The planned obsolescence of the battery seems plausible, but a thinner battery doesn’t really correspond to a shorter lifespan, just a shorter duty cycle. Maybe it’s just a vanity thing, like a competition between companies, but the bean-counters don’t usually let that sort of thing keep going if it doesn’t sell. Maybe it’s marketing, but that never really succeeds either. I really don’t know.
IR Blaster, Headphone Jack, swappable battery.
Ultimately…
Less thin, I hate this constant race to be the thinnest phone - lighter I would maybe be for - but thinner, fuck off.
Why I didn’t buy a Fold7 recently:
I’ve been impressed by my Ulefone 27T. It’s an armoured brick with a 10,000mAh battery. Waterproof, with IR and headphone jack. It also has a thermal camera.
Holy crap.
Across the board, in product survey after product survey, consumers agree with you every time about thin phones. At best nobody cares beyond being briefly conceptually impressed (in a way that doesn’t translate into sales), at worst people actively hate how fragile it looks (or actually is). They always would rather have more battery life than a thinner phone, and actually below a certain weight most consumers prefer a phone to be heavier.
So why do companies keep racing to make the thinnest phones?
I honestly have no idea. This isn’t one of those things where I pose a rhetorical question and then answer it. The planned obsolescence of the battery seems plausible, but a thinner battery doesn’t really correspond to a shorter lifespan, just a shorter duty cycle. Maybe it’s just a vanity thing, like a competition between companies, but the bean-counters don’t usually let that sort of thing keep going if it doesn’t sell. Maybe it’s marketing, but that never really succeeds either. I really don’t know.
Because Steve Jobs’ ghost still haunts and demands all designs to be as anti consumer as possible
Anti-consumer for the sake of the bottom line is to be expected, but they’re burning millions of dollars on this.