In Portal, using the portal gun to get to the moon is the obvious space travel usage, but I think people are overlooking how it’d let you trivially break the rocket equation.
Hell, you could build a >1g torchship using nothing but the ocean.
In Portal, using the portal gun to get to the moon is the obvious space travel usage, but I think people are overlooking how it’d let you trivially break the rocket equation.
Hell, you could build a >1g torchship using nothing but the ocean.
And what if you put one end on an enemy planet and the other end in low orbit around Betelgeuse when it finally goes supernova?
How many gamma rays will come through a hole in space about a meter across?
my guess based on how big supernovas are (bigger than that. no matter how much you estimate “that” to be), the answer is “enough”
anyway so there’s a point in Portal 2 where you fire a portal at a surface that’s far enough away that there’s noticeable light-speed delay before the portal opens, right?
but is that based on the distance between portals or the distance from the gun?
like, in the game’s specific scenario, the distinction is irrelevant, but the portal gun is mobile after all. what if you set up a portal on earth, then hop in a rocket to pluto, then when you land, you fire it at the surface of pluto.
The distance between the gun and the surface is minimal, but the portal pair you just set up is about 5 light-hours long.
Does it take 5 hours for the portal to open? or does it open instantly?
anyway the fact the aperture science facility extended so deep underground in portal 2 was interesting.
hey, you know what a very deep underground facility would be real useful for? dropping stuff through portals and having it fall a long time, accelerating as much as possible.
I bet there’s a borehole we never see that’s just top to bottom and has as much atmosphere as possible evacuated from it, to lower air resistance
@foone@digipres.club as long as you have two portals set up in a loop, would the actual distance between them matter at all? You could just put two portals 1nm apart in a vacuum and create an infinite accelerator. Then move the exit portal and BOOM
@foone@digipres.club Fun fact: holes like this are also useful for testing the effects of microgravity. NASA maintains several near Cleveland for studying the effects of microgravity on fluids like air, water, plasmas, etc. IIRC you get useful results until you hit terminal velocity
@foone@digipres.club Why even bother evacuating the atmosphere, that’s probably how they manage to heat the whole place :-)
@foone@digipres.club
In @cstross@wandering.shop 's Glasshouse, they would drop one end of a very small portal into a blue giant star and the other end over to some kind of power plant, and they’d have all the energy and all the power they’d ever need.
@foone@digipres.club the gamma rays are gonna be mostly negligible when you get hit with particulate accelerated with a foe of energy
@susul@misskey.heonian.org I was thinking that the portal would be very short-lived, because the surface you placed it on would be quickly destroyed, but there’d be a short period where the initial gamma rays make it through.
but yeah, if you can somehow keep it open longer than milliseconds after the instant of the star’s collapse, you’d absolutely wreck anything near the endpoint