TechCodex@programming.dev to Programmer Humor@programming.devEnglish · 1 year agoWould you agree?programming.devimagemessage-square19fedilinkarrow-up115arrow-down13
arrow-up112arrow-down1imageWould you agree?programming.devTechCodex@programming.dev to Programmer Humor@programming.devEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square19fedilink
minus-squarefloofloof@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 year agoThe problem is capitalism, not which kernel everything runs. And the reason FOSS isn’t universal is also capitalism.
minus-squarezagaberoo@beehaw.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·1 year agoIt’s more complicated to make money producing FOSS, capitalism or not. Lots of reasonable developers would still choose closed source even without capitalism.
minus-squarehellishharlot@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoMaking money is a capitalist adjacent idea. The premise that we need money to figure out how to allocate resources is foolish
The problem is capitalism, not which kernel everything runs. And the reason FOSS isn’t universal is also capitalism.
It’s more complicated to make money producing FOSS, capitalism or not. Lots of reasonable developers would still choose closed source even without capitalism.
Making money is a capitalist adjacent idea. The premise that we need money to figure out how to allocate resources is foolish