• GissaMittJobb@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    1 year ago

    Being the U.S, there’s basically zero chance that it would be high-rises. Instead, there would be McMansions. Also a lot more parking lots

    • Gladaed@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      This looks like low-mid density. So much roads/wasted space and like 10 high rites do not make a high density neighborhood.

    • LemmyKnowsBest@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      No, real estate moguls have learned that apartments and high-rise condos and hotels are more profitable than single family homes.

        • bane_killgrind@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          If they rezone a national park to residential it will definitely be highrise MDU.

          Edit more space efficient for the NIMGC tree huggers

            • bane_killgrind@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Continuous grade of square footage is one factor, the suburb would have trouble with sprawl and boulder ingress

              • SkepticalButOpenMinded@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Yes, car centric suburbs have tons of problems but when has that ever stopped us? We build them in literal flood plains, and along cramped mudslide prone mountains. I’ve never heard of an empty piece of land in the middle of nowhere being zoned for high density residential in the US.