• henfredemars@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    It is still a pretty dumb strategy to criticize an oligarch on their own platform. They could even edit the words he said and there’s nothing you can do.

      • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        What?

        He went on Trump’s sub and tried to get them to like him by editing their comments…

        If that’s what you mean. Weird way to phrase it.

        • Lka1988@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          Still a shitty thing to do. As a site admin for millions of people, that person has an ethical and potentially legal obligation to not touch the internal database.

          If he did it to those users, who else’s comments did he edit?

  • x00z@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    I suggest everybody to read up on the Twitter files.

    https://www.ungaway.com/p/twitter-files-1-11-downloads-pdf

    Part 2 (Release 2) is where they talk about the labels, such as “Do Not Amplify”.

    Musk was talking all big about how this bullshit sucks and he wants to get rid of it. But he’s just doing the same thing, on an even worse scale.

    Oh, shadowbanning, or something like “Do Not Amplify”, is against the DSA in the EU and thus illegal.