• qevlarr@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    9 months ago

    Exactly. Identify what uses are legitimate and what uses aren’t, and legislate directly. None of this consumer consent crap because it’s meaningless to consumers. No consumer benefits from their browsing habits being under surveillance.

    • Nyfure@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      Was done before too, but now the websites simply need a banner for using categories of cookies which require it (tracking, marketing, …)
      And we already have GDPR at least limiting activities in a broad sense. (of course lots of leeway, but still much better than before)
      You cannot do more with a cookie banner you couldnt already do before.