• TWeaK@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    72
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    10 months ago

    I almost wish everyone hadn’t defederated from hexbear so that we had more stories of the mental gymnastics justifying continues support of Putin after he banned being gay.

      • TWeaK@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        10 months ago

        lemm.ee has hexbear, and I can feel the admin writhing while he allows them to persist - even after they banned me entire for “capitalist apologia”, “Genocide denial” and “Pro-zionist Lib , Get f*cked Ben Hazir !!!” - all of which would classify as the crime of defamation.

        But, at the same time, I wouldn’t have those bullshit definitions if I didn’t face them head on and call them out for their bullshit, using open modlogs where they themselves can’t hide.

      • lugal@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        21
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        “Don’t call it genocide! He just wants Russian #landback”

        • PugJesus@kbin.socialOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          34
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          Turns out tankies are actually just as pro-genocide of indigenous people as the far-right are, so long as it’s Russia or China doing it.

          Which is, of course, doubly insane considering that Russia isn’t even run by the Russian Communist Party anymore.

          • Stovetop@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            28
            ·
            10 months ago

            Enemy of my enemy logic, basically. There are people who have such a disdain for the west that they will lionize any political figures who also hate the west, no matter how contradictory their stated ideals are.

            • Rikudou_Sage@lemmings.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              16
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              10 months ago

              Funny thing is they still live in the west. At least stand by your opinion and move to fucking Russia. I think they’re especially welcoming of males in their 20s (only if you’re born a male and live as a male, sorry, their “tolerance” doesn’t run that far).

              • wildginger@lemmy.myserv.one
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                10 months ago

                You know thats a nonsense thing to say. Moving countries is so fucking expensive, its not something you can just do.

                Dont make your quips sound as out of touch as the people youre quipping

                • PugJesus@kbin.socialOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  10
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  10 months ago

                  Moving countries is so fucking expensive, its not something you can just do.

                  Actually, Russia has put a great deal of effort into making moving and acquiring citizenship very easy, as of late, and very affordable.

                  So long as you join up in the Russian military.

          • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            It’s worse than that. They’re totally amoral. They can’t see beyond their stupid idea of the way they think the world should be. They’re pro-genocide when it benefits their ideology. I haven’t heard much cheering on of Israel from Tankies right now, but if Putin or Xi suddenly allied with them? They’d be begging the Israelis to bulldoze more Palestinian homes with people inside of them.

    • ihavenopeopleskills@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      47
      ·
      10 months ago

      Defederating doesn’t serve anyone’s interest. If you don’t like a community or a server, block them. Let the rest of us decide for ourselves.

      • PugJesus@kbin.socialOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        41
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        10 months ago

        Some of us prefer the Fediverse to look a little less like 4chan and pigs shitting on their own balls, and a little more like literally anything else. It’s the same reason why that one alt-right instance was defederated by just about everyone.

      • Rikudou_Sage@lemmings.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        35
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Oh, it does. As an admin, my “job” is hard enough with the regular spammers, don’t need whole instances dedicated to spamming in my mod queue. Why do I need to make my hobby harder because people want to decide for themselves?

        Luckily, this is fediverse and you have options! You can host your own single person instance and federate with everyone. Just be prepared for some child porn federating onto your hard drives.

        • TWeaK@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          10 months ago

          You can prevent child porn and everything from federating in, you just have to restrict your instance. lemm.ee does not allow any images to be locally hosted. It becomes a bit of a hassle having to manually host something somewhere else, but that’s how reddit started out so nae bother.

            • TWeaK@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              10 months ago

              The post is in /c/meta@lemm.ee, though it’s one that I missed.

              Non-instance agnostic link (because there are no instance agnostic links for comments or posts): https://lemm.ee/post/19843583

              I really wish instances didn’t links for their comments and posts. lemmy.world/comment/123456 is a different link to lemm.ee/comment/123456, when really it should simply be that lemmy.world/comment/123456 is the same as lemm.ee/comment/123456@lemmy.world.

        • wildginger@lemmy.myserv.one
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          What do you even do about that? Is that immediately a crime because your server hosted those images? Like obviously you defed from guilty instances asap, but what do you do as the instance owner in the interim? Report and delete?

          • Rikudou_Sage@lemmings.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            10 months ago

            Report and delete. If you’re lucky, you’re not the one to discover it and it hasn’t federated yet, so you defederate preemptively.

            I know at least one admin, who quit because he was afraid of police raids because of child porn. He said that the US police are quite uncompromising in such cases, but I’m not from the US so I don’t know, EU rules seem a lot saner.

      • ahornsirup@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        You can’t block entire instances as a user, at least not on Lemmy. You can block all communities (only since very recently) hosted on an instance, but you can’t block the community, that is the users, trolling around the wider fediverse.

        • PugJesus@kbin.socialOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          10 months ago

          I would also argue that having shitheads around and shitting up the comment sections encourages a site culture of shitheaddery. Like, well, 4chan.

          • DahGangalang@infosec.pub
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            Which puts fuckheads like me in a tough spot, since I want a classic “old internet” (read as: 4chan culture of shitheadery) feel to the place, but also don’t want to infringe on people like you’s ability to enjoy a relatively clean internet space.

            Given everything, I think having “clean” servers that defederate from toxic ones is probably the way to go just to ensure new users can have a generally good time. Then let more advanced users (like me) go find the “never defederate” instances to sign up to get that old timely feel.

            So…uh, yeah TL;DR: I think I’m on the other guy’s side, but also think you have the right of it.

            • PugJesus@kbin.socialOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              10 months ago

              Hey man, if you or your instance wants to take a dive into the deep end, I don’t mean to stop any of you. I would just prefer the parts of the Fediverse I deal with to be clean of pigs shitting on their balls and the people who spread it.

              • DahGangalang@infosec.pub
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                10 months ago

                Yeah, the real issue is that I’m too cheap to pay for a domain name / setting up a server, though it is a goal once some other life things straightened out for me.

      • TWeaK@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        10 months ago

        Defederation is absolutely a valid tool to deal with spam instances. It’s less of a valid tool for dealing with voices and opinions you don’t like.

        Unfortunately, sometimes it can be hard to differentiate between the two.

  • tjsauce@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    10 months ago

    Just cause the USSR wasn’t as bad as the US claimed doesn’t mean it was as good as the USSR claimed. Praising Stalin implies that the good he did outweighs his death toll

  • lugal@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    10 months ago

    Did he even write theory? I mean, Lenin and Trotsky did but did Stalin?

    • PugJesus@kbin.socialOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      32
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      Stalin did some writing, but depending on which tankie you ask, it’s either REVOLUTIONARY AND ASTOUNDING WORK THAT IS UNFAIRLY OVERLOOKED, or just verbose rehashing of Lenin with an (extra) dash of authoritarianism.

    • antidote101@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      I believe his contribution was the idea that a dictatorship of the prolitariate is untenable, and that the state needs a single leader in order to achieve Marxism.

      • lugal@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        Sounds like tankies will love it and Marx would have hated it

    • Jonna@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      He did. It contradicts basic tenants of Marxism, but he did write theory.

      Edit: tenets. That’s embarrassing. Thanks.

    • Aux@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      Stalin did a lot. But most of all he did killing of innocent people.

  • blahsay@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    10 months ago

    The tankies problem is not that he’s misunderstood…it is that he’s understood

  • CurlyWurlies4All@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    This is beside the point but also fuck Trotsky. Trotsky’s basic idea consisted of applying military methods in the economic field and of turning the entire population of Russia into a vast army of labour, destroying the trade unions and forcing the workforce into jobs they could not leave without the permission of high authorities. Any shirking of duty or unauthorized absence from work was to be punished on the same basis as desertion from the army. Fuck that guy.

    But also fuck capitalism. It’s horrific.

    • banneryear1868@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      Marx also viewed capitalism as a necessary intermediary step towards achieving communism and saw it as an improvement to what existed before it. An amazing thing about the Russian Revolution and USSR is they went from feudalism to a modern communist state in less than a generation. In that context it was incredible what they were able to achieve in the time they did and we can recognize areas it worked independent of the rest.

      There’s been some pretty good discussion about whether capitalism or communism has resulted in more deaths overall, and the value in that isn’t to arrive at some final tally to find who wins.

      • CurlyWurlies4All@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        10 months ago

        A lot of what Marx wrote about the two stage revolution was written in direct response to the failure of the Paris Commune. Marx also saw socialism as the inevitable successor to capitalism. But there are socialist traditions that predate his theories and there’s nothing to say he was wrong on some things.

        • banneryear1868@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          Yeah like his labor theory of value has basically been disproven but that doesn’t have to negate his critique of modernity and his view of class conflict, notion of private property, exploitation, etc. Historical materialism is hugely influential even today. Marx didn’t outline some rigid framework for a communist utopia either.

          Hegel’s idealism as well… Marx began as a Hegelian in Germany and increasingly became critical of Hegel’s dialectic. His concept of dialectical materialism is a response to Hegel and turns it on it’s head. The notion that material conditions aren’t shaped by human ideas and values but instead that human ideas and values are a response to material conditions.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      The problem is that so many people can’t see that there are any shades of grey between Trotskyist communism and free market capitalism. Like it has to be one absolute or the other. Such bizarre black-and-white thinking.

  • MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    10 months ago

    You see, communism, in theory, is great. The biggest problem is that it requires a benevolent authority to determine what is provided based on what is needed and wanted.

    This is a problem because usually communist countries are structured at authoritarian, where the head of state, a person, usually some guy, is in charge of such things, generally with the help of those in the government. Being human and innately flawed and selfish, all communist systems thus far, seem to follow the same trend of exploitation and indentured servitude for the majority of the populous, meanwhile the “upper class”, mainly the elite and the person’s that make up the government live in luxury. More for them and the bare minimum for everyone else.

    If this human factor problem could be resolved, then communism would be a great system. Everyone shares in the wealth and success of their countrymen. But since people are the cornerstone of any government, the system will always be prone to exploitation of the people.

    As for Stalin specifically, I don’t see him or his actions as notably different than any other communist dictator. They are all equally terrible people for very different human rights crimes.

    I like the idea of communism, but I wouldn’t trust any single person to be in charge… I wouldn’t even trust a coalition of people to run it. It would need the involvement of enough people from the population from all different walks of life to essentially vote on policy changes constantly in order to ensure that no individual or group of individuals is unfairly benefiting from the situation, which, that, in and of itself, would be a nightmare to try to put together, manage, coordinate, and abide by.

    Capitalism under democracy isn’t a picnic, but at least there’s enough responsibility imposed on the system by the population that is being governed, that any exploitation is generally slowed at least, or eliminated at best (often the former and not the latter).

    • PugJesus@kbin.socialOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      I… have a lot to say and not enough energy left to say it.

      I would suggest that you’re conflating communism with Marxism-Leninism, which is a common mistake, since the SovUnion spent a good 70 years trying to make them synonymous (and their capitalist enemies being more than happy to assist), and that you should look into non-ML systems.

    • Franklin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      Your main critique is the same reason capitalism doesn’t work, eventually money begets power which buys up competition, markets get cornered and it turns into cronyism.

    • Milk_Sheikh@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      10 months ago

      I genuinely don’t think state-communism is possible without deep corruption and exploitation, or humans not being in charge. 100-odd people in a commune working together can make it work together, but then you’re just easy pickings for bandits/gangs, or state violence from outside conventional forms of government.

      Inflate the population and then all sorts of sociological problems crop up that require intra-system violence/coercion to prevent the whole system crumbling down when everyone wants to be a grief councilor or artist, but all these mfs need to eat so a lot of somebodies are working the fields against their will.

      The ills of capitalism are obvious to those living under it, but talk to someone who lived in the USSR and they’re very likely not charitable about the government they lived under either.

    • KptnAutismus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      exactly the points i always make. at the moment, our best shot is a democratic society with well-regulated capitalism (be it by workers unions, trade limitations like the japanese car import limits in the US, and things like universal healthcare and monetary aid for unemployed people)

    • Neuromancer@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      10 months ago

      I’ve been to Cuba. I’ve never seen such a shit show in my life. There were still wealthy and the large majority were dirt poor. Police everywhere. Military everywhere. Havana smelled horrible and there were massive food shortages.

      That said the people were friendly. They talked how they wish they could go to America but they can’t.

      It was sad. My polish friends described polish communism the same way and they were fairly high up in the party. As soon as they had the chance to defect they did.

    • Aux@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      14
      ·
      10 months ago

      Capitalism under a democracy is pretty much a picnic to everyone who went through communism. Fuck this commie shit!

      • Bartsbigbugbag@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        10 months ago

        Funny, because data shows almost the exact opposite. Conditions in Ex-Soviet countries were worse for decades after the collapse, and some of them still haven’t returned to pre-collapse levels. The majority of people in the majority of former USSR republics hold positive memories of the Soviet Union, and majorities even believe that life was better when the Union was around.

      • MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        I don’t know where in my post you thought I was in support of communism in general beyond the idealistic concept of what it could be. In every way, it is a shit show mainly because of the people that are making the decisions.

        In no way am I advocating for communism over capitalism/democracy. I’m just giving an analysis from a fairly neutral viewpoint.

  • butter@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    10 months ago

    It bugs me that this is using Futurama people. I don’t believe any of them have ever said the word demonization.

    Or would have a strong opinion on Stalin, being so far in the Future.

  • Facebones@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    10 months ago

    90% of these “no amount of good offsets the bad” types are Trump supporters waiting for him to cancel elections. 😂