Rank-and-file members of both the House and Senate are paid $174,000 a year.

That probably seems like a decent amount of money, and it is: The median household income in 2022 was $74,580, according to the US Census.

But consider that members of Congress generally have to maintain two residences — one in Washington, DC, and one in their home state — and that they haven’t gotten a raise since 2009.

Inflation, meanwhile, has eaten away at the value of that salary over time: If lawmakers’ salaries had kept pace with inflation, they would be paid over $250,000 today.

Rep. Patrick McHenry, a North Carolina Republican who served as the interim speaker of the House following Kevin McCarthy’s ouster, told The Dispatch that congressional pay needed to be raised in order to attract “credible people to run for office.”

  • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    46
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    10 months ago

    This isn’t as wild as it sounds.

    A family friend was elected to Congress, and he had been an HVAC contractor prior to his election, and the move to DC was financially difficult because DC housing is very expensive and they still had a mortgage back in their district.

    How did he work things out? He started accepting donations, and that’s as slippery slope. He’s become as corrupt as they come and I’m ashamed to have been his friend.

    • BeautifulMind ♾️@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Now if only states maintained congressional residences in DC so their congressmen don’t find themselves saddled with +million-dollar mortgages on homes they might only be living in for 2 or 4 years.

      Really, if you’re sitting on a million-dollar mortgage and you might be primaried in your next election if you don’t play ball with the lobbyists (or more to the point, you’d have to keep paying it after your tenure in congress ends) isn’t that just bending freshman congressmen over a barrel to be corrupted?

      Conversely, imagine the scenario if you lose your re-election bid and in order to pursue the post-congress lobbying career you’d have to buy yourself a new home in DC.

      Normalize getting the fuck out of DC when you’re out of office, guys/make it expensive to stay on

      • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        10 months ago

        I’ve long said there should be a congressional dorm. Two, maybe four to a room, they share a bathroom with the room next door, one of those fridges with a microwave bolted to the top, cameras in the hallways.

          • Asafum@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            10 months ago

            Honestly I’ve read that a lack of interaction between members of Congress has lead to a part of our extreme politics lately. They used to have dinners and such together and with enough interaction even representitives from opposite parties would become friends/friendly.

            Maybe having a Democrat and Republican share a room isn’t such a bad idea lol although some people eventually hate their roommates so… Mixed bag I guess lol

            • postmateDumbass@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              10 months ago

              Make them all live like in 12 Monkeys.

              Just go the full monty and make it a cult.

              They can sell soap for re-election funds.

          • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            10 months ago

            We could pack all of them into a Quonset hut, each one gets a twin-size bunk and a foot locker like your average soldier. Maybe we should issue them mandatory identical clothing too.

          • pandacoder@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            Taxpayers shouldn’t have to pay out the ass just so they can live a nicer life than the rest of us while they continually make far more than us and don’t try to govern properly (like raising our minimum wage).

            If normal people need a bunch of roommates to afford DC, the less well-off Congressmen can deal with something similar until they have made enough good financial decisions to get something nicer, just like the rest of us do.

            Also if someone sucks at making financial decisions, I honestly don’t think they should be in a position to decide fiscal legislation for the entire country, it’s clearly not a skill in their wheelhouse and that’s not the place to acquire that skill.

            • postmateDumbass@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              10 months ago

              The problem is only the wealthy could afford to hold office.

              Does rule by the 1% sound like a good idea?

              Frankly the people advocating to force minimum wage living conditions on congress people are not respecting the problem or must be some of those “accelerationists” that just want everything to fall apart so it can get worse before it gets better.

              I get that (most) people are upset with Do Nothing Congress 2: Insurrectionist Boogaloo, but to replace them with minimum wage rookies and blue blood elites raised to run the world is not a good idea. Its extremely stupid.

              • pandacoder@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                10 months ago

                Not that I’m (seriously) advocating for them to go into a dorm, but these people decide their salaries.

                If they were doing their job properly they would have raised it, or better yet they would have established a higher-end apartment-dorm type solution that is paid for by the state and so their paychecks are not used to cover their living expenses in DC (not college freshman standards, more like two bedroom apartments unless they want to pony up part of their paycheck, one for a bed and one for an office).

                They’re not actually doing either of these things though, so I hardly feel bad.

      • Trainguyrom@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        10 months ago

        This is an extremely high quality take! We have governors mansions in some (all?) States, the president gets the white house, but what do elected officials at the national level get?

    • DreamlandLividity@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      10 months ago

      Exactly. Paying them $10 milion a year would be a drop in the bucket to the us gov (about 0.1% of the budget).

      And if it made them immune to lobbying and work for the people properly, it would be money well spent.

      Unfortunately, I am not convinced raising their salary would help that much.