You think normalizing the existence of trans people is transphobic?
Why would you go out of your way to be an asshole to a complete stranger?
OP asked for guesses.The body fat distribution and breast shape of the lady on the left could easily belong to a trans person. It’s not a value judgment. Don’t be a dick.
You think normalizing the existence of trans people is transphobic?
Of course not, that would be silly
The body fat distribution and breast shape of the lady on the left could easily belong to a trans person. It’s not a value judgment.
But that is. And misogynistic to boot. And you don’t get to decide if your statement is a value judgment. You might not intend it to be negative, but there are people who are now trying to decide who’s trans based solely on looks in order to discriminate against them (and all women, by proxy). So, by making a statement that that women is trans based on literally nothing, you’re perpetuating those types of “true feminine trait” myths and causing harm. Thusly, a negative value judgment. Which is why you’re being downvoted to hell, cause there’s no other way to take your original statement without additional context.
It’s neither transphobic nor misogynistic. You are wrong and your opinion doesn’t matter. I’m the only person who gets to decide if my statement is a value judgment.
Everyone who downvoted me is also wrong and I don’t care. If the thought of trans people existing alongside cis people causes you to hit the downvote button, your opinion is worthless. And if you interpret the mere existence of trans people as a negative statement, same difference. You’re either down voting because you hate trans people, or because you’re interpreting a neutral statement is being transphobic. Either way I’m not upset by it.
You think normalizing the existence of trans people is transphobic?
Why would you go out of your way to be an asshole to a complete stranger?
OP asked for guesses.The body fat distribution and breast shape of the lady on the left could easily belong to a trans person. It’s not a value judgment. Don’t be a dick.
Of course not, that would be silly
But that is. And misogynistic to boot. And you don’t get to decide if your statement is a value judgment. You might not intend it to be negative, but there are people who are now trying to decide who’s trans based solely on looks in order to discriminate against them (and all women, by proxy). So, by making a statement that that women is trans based on literally nothing, you’re perpetuating those types of “true feminine trait” myths and causing harm. Thusly, a negative value judgment. Which is why you’re being downvoted to hell, cause there’s no other way to take your original statement without additional context.
It’s neither transphobic nor misogynistic. You are wrong and your opinion doesn’t matter. I’m the only person who gets to decide if my statement is a value judgment.
Everyone who downvoted me is also wrong and I don’t care. If the thought of trans people existing alongside cis people causes you to hit the downvote button, your opinion is worthless. And if you interpret the mere existence of trans people as a negative statement, same difference. You’re either down voting because you hate trans people, or because you’re interpreting a neutral statement is being transphobic. Either way I’m not upset by it.
Boy that went south fast. But it is still a nice picture and they are definitely having fun.