• VioletTeacup@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    There’s no reason to be rude. I strongly suggest you reread what I said and consider the context of the thread. I never said that 9/11 was a successful use of terrorism, I said that the statement Data made about the troubles being successful was offensive and would be similar to saying the same thing about other terrorist attacks. You then aggressively began demanding evidence for something that was never a statement of fact, making it unclear what you were talking about. When further questioned, you became genuinely insulting for absolutely no reason. I won’t be responding again, but please take some time to consider how you approach discussions in the future.

    • gregorum@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I never said that 9/11 was a successful use of terrorism

      I have quoted you several times saying exactly that.

      I said that the statement Data made about the troubles being successful was offensive and would be similar to saying the same thing about other terrorist attacks.

      you may have intended to argue that, but you clearly argued:

      It’s sort of like saying 9/11 was an effective use of terrorism

      and now you keep insisting that:

      You then aggressively began demanding evidence for something that was never a statement of fact, making it unclear what you were talking about.

      when you very clearly said this:

      It’s sort of like saying 9/11 was an effective use of terrorism

      and now are acting indignant that I have to keep reminding you of that and how you’re somehow unclear of why after I’ve explained it several times.

      I’’m very sorry you can’t wrap your head around this. and, yes, it’s best you don’t respond again, as I’d just keep repeating myself.

      • VioletTeacup@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        It’s sort of like saying 9/11 was an effective use of terrorism.” Sorry, I don’t know how this could have been clearer. Take care!

        • gregorum@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          if that’s what you meant, perhaps you should have said that at some point…

          I don’t know how this could have been clearer

          by saying what you mean and actually providing evidence to back up your claims, as I have said repeatedly.

            • gregorum@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              except for the first time you said it in your last comment, show me where you said “9/11 was a terrorist attack" before. because what you were arguing before was:

              It’s sort of like saying 9/11 was an effective use of terrorism

              do you have amnesia?

                • gregorum@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  ok, so, you do have amnesia and have forgotten our entire conversation. well, then I suggest you go back to the beginning because I’m not walking you through this again.