In light of Nexus Mods and Mod DB banning the No Pronouns mod for Starfield, I figured I would look around for alternative sources and collect them in one place for others’ convenience. This seems like a good place to put them.

Trusted

Caution Advised

  • firebreathingbunny@kbin.socialOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Which grammar rule changed since Shakespeare’s time? The reason students can still read and understand Shakespeare’s works is that the grammar remains the same. Congratulations, you owned yourself.

    • stopthatgirl7@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Ironically, one of the biggest changes from Shakespeare’s time and now concerned pronouns. We stopped using “thou/thee” as the informal 2nd person and began to only use what had been the formal 2nd person, “you,” and stopped using the verb conjugations for them.

      Meanwhile, the 3rd person singular “they” has been in use since Chaucer’s time.

        • stopthatgirl7@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          My brother in Christ; I’M AN ENGLISH TEACHER.

          If you don’t understand how “we lost an entire pronoun and the verb inflection that went with it” is in fact grammar, I don’t even know what to tell you.

          • firebreathingbunny@kbin.socialOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            I’M AN ENGLISH TEACHER.

            Apparently not a very good one, because:

            • You don’t know the difference between vocabulary and grammar.
            • You don’t know that appeal to authority is a logical fallacy.
            • You don’t know what being dismissed means.

            Bye.

    • Eggyhead@artemis.camp
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Just off the top of my head: In some US dialects, rather than a single word changing between negative and positive form (e.g. “I didn’t take any pictures”), instead an entire sentence is shifted into a negative mode (“I didn’t take no pictures”). Traditional grammar rules would dictate that as a double negative, implying the speaker did in fact take pictures, but only an idiot would actually choose interpret it that way.

      Next, we have the impact of the internet. “lol” might occasionally be spoken aloud in many circumstances as a substitute for “that’s funny” or something similar. Colloquial written English is all over the place. We now not only use “lol”, but “fwiw,” “afaik,” and many others.

      Then there’s emoji. We’re basically using glyphs to express ideas, not unlike how kanji works, and traditional rules of grammar don’t always apply when you’re expressing an idea through pictures, though it’s interesting when it does. Animated GIFs and memes often butcher grammar rules without sacrificing any understanding of intent.

      A simple google search turns up many more examples than I could possibly be aware of.

      Now it’s your turn. Feel free to explain why you think using “they” as a singular pronoun applies as a grammar rule violation in the 21st century. If you can’t use more than a typical snarky one or two-liner, you should just consider this argument lost and rethink your life.

        • Eggyhead@artemis.camp
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Dialects aren’t the actual language. They’re just wilful ignorance.

          Say everyone bakes a potato. If your neighbor baked theirs differently than you, would that mean they’re ignorant?

          And, again, vocabulary isn’t grammar.

          Good for you? No one said it was.