• BluesF@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    86
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    11 months ago

    The idea that population numbers are all it takes is so stupid. Mozart is not just one guy who was really good at writing music. I mean, obviously, he literally was, but he only existed and wrote what he did in the way he did because of not only his own “genius” but also the circumstances he was raised in, his education, the musical traditions that he drew from, the fact that he was wealthy and had time… Etc etc.

    Adding more people living in poverty, with poor education, no connection to musical or artistic tradition, and no time… Will not add more Mozarts.

    • SuddenDownpour@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      57
      ·
      11 months ago

      “I am, somehow, less interested in the weight and convolutions of Einstein’s brain than in the near certainty that people of equal talent have lived and died in cotton fields and sweatshops”

      • Stephen Jay Gould
    • m0darn@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      Mozart wasn’t wealthy, his customers (patrons) were. His father trained him in the family trade from birth and put him to work at a young age.

      He had a lot in common with Michael Jackson in that way, but Michael got insanely rich and Mozart didn’t.