Similar to the recent question about artists where you can successfully separate them from their art. Are there any artists who did something so horrible, so despicable, that it has instantly invalidated all art that they have had any part in?

  • DaDragon@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    9 months ago

    I disagree. You can both admit that the company makes one damn fine chicken sandwich and still not buy it because they support slave labour. Them supporting slave labour doesn’t make it a bad chicken sandwich, just as them making a damn good chicken sandwich doesn’t stop them from supporting slave labour. It’s the method that’s important, not the reason itself.

    • squiblet@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      That’s the point though, that some people will use the ‘but chicken sandwich is good’ as a justification to overlook the other problems and still buy them. My ex and Hobby Lobby, for instance - she’d want to go there and shop for paints because they ‘might have a sale’, and I was just uh, no? Fuck Hobby Lobby.

      • Kalash@feddit.ch
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        Continue buying products direclty supports the company, that doesn’t necessarily apply to art. Me simple enjoying a piece of art doesn’t support the creator. Only when I buy or licence it.

        • squiblet@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 months ago

          Sure, but overlooking moral misgivings is the similarity. Just like I wouldn’t tell someone ‘hey, I love this sale at Hobby Lobby!’ I wouldn’t feel right about endorsing a star or director or artist or musician who was found to be a terrible person. The same applies to enjoying it in private - my knowledge about the creator would somewhat ruin my enjoyment of their work.

          • Kalash@feddit.ch
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            I wouldn’t feel right about endorsing a star or director or artist or musician who was found to be a terrible person.

            I don’t think enjoying or even endorising a piece of art is equivalent to endorsing the people that produced it.

            For example I will always enjoy Firefly and will keep recommending it to people, simple because it’s a amazing show. What ever Joss Whedon has done doesn’t change that. Hell, I wouldn’t care if it was directed by Hitler and produced by Jeffery Dahmer.

            • squiblet@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              9 months ago

              That seems to be the topic here… some people do feel uncomfortable about works having a connection to a terrible person, others don’t. Personally I do think about the creator of artistic works when consuming them or as a fan, and I don’t really want to be thinking “huh, I wonder what Hitler and Dahmer were thinking when they made that decision”. On the other hand, some people love thinking about awful people like serial killers.

    • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      I am a fat guy, there sandwich is only marginally better than the lowest end stuff, any fast casual local place is going to do it better. You can trust a fat man about fried meat.