Note:

I swapped the original article at the request of a mod to from a source deemed more reliable, but to avoid confusion when reading the comment section prior to this edit, here is the link to the original article. I chose the Relief Web source listed by some who commented. Cheers!

  • Tenthrow@lemmy.worldM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    11 months ago

    Please provide corroborating story link from a credible source. I will have to remove if the story link can’t be updated to a more reputable source.

    • ???@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      It was already removed by a mod and then restored. But yeah, no problem, I will find a better link and switch it now.

      Edit: done

      • Tenthrow@lemmy.worldM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Thank you. We were getting reports on it, and I didn’t want to remove it if it was a credible story.

      • Tenthrow@lemmy.worldM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 months ago

        It was showing as middle of the road for the credibility rating, which on its own is shaky but with a corroborating report strengthens it.

        • naturalgasbad@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          IIRC it’s considered middle of the road due to political leanings rather than the actual credibility of the reporting.

          Which, tbh, is sort of concerning when evaluating credibility because political leanings do not change whether a report is factual or not.