FCC doubts ability to provide high-speed, low-latency service in all grant areas.

SpaceX blasts FCC as it refuses to reinstate Starlink’s $886 million grant::FCC doubts ability to provide high-speed, low-latency service in all grant areas.

    • Rapidcreek@lemmy.worldEnglish
      914·
      11 months ago

      They pulled wire for miles to service rural areas and are maintaining a network to service rural customers. The BOCs are why there are RUS funds

      • wahming@monyet.ccEnglish
        29·
        11 months ago

        They were paid to provide broadband services to the rural areas. As millions of people living in the rural areas can attest, the majority of their promises were not fulfilled.

        • Rapidcreek@lemmy.worldEnglish
          226·
          11 months ago

          No. They were paid to provide services, which is what they did/do. The rural customers pay no more than urban customers but use a hell of a lot lot more infrastructure. Broadband is now a service that can be used for RUS, that’s all.

              • BearOfaTime@lemm.eeEnglish
                121·
                11 months ago

                I have friends who live within a handful of miles of DC with ZERO wired infrastructure. Fortunately that part of the US is pretty flat, and an LTE provider decided to cover the area.

                Mind, they’re about 1 mile from a major highway, so it’s not like they’re in the back woods.

                The cable company was paid to build to that area 40 years ago, but never did it.

                I agree building out wired infrastructure seems to make the most sense, as it’s pretty robust, and we’re often finding new ways to increase effective bandwidth (even on good old telephone wires). But it’s a bit of chicken and egg, like any network infrastructure (water, sewer, roads, bridges, etc).

                Edit: Keep in mind over 60% of the US population resides on the East Coast, between Boston and Georgia. So building infrastructure there is high bang for the buck.

                • Rapidcreek@lemmy.worldEnglish
                  16·
                  11 months ago

                  At one time, I reviewed the entire telecom operations structure in DC in as a vendor conditioning exercise. Considering what DC has, I’m very surprised. If the wired network is far enough away, a digital line isn’t viable. But, roads are usually covered for mobile phone. I would see if the local mobile operators, like Verizon, might have 5G available.

          • wahming@monyet.ccEnglish
            16·
            11 months ago

            RUS

            Just so we’re clear, the discussion here is not about RUS, but the Rural Broadband Initiative. ISPs were paid billions to bring broadband services to the countryside. They took the money and did nothing with it.

            • Rapidcreek@lemmy.worldEnglish
              216·
              11 months ago

              Rural Utility Service is the government body where the initiative exists. Hard to bring a true broadband to rural areas. For any decent customer penetration you need radio. IDK, but I think 5G qualifies if there isn’t a range problem.