aggelalex@lemmy.world to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 1 year agoRegellemmy.worldimagemessage-square19fedilinkarrow-up1491arrow-down10
arrow-up1491arrow-down1imageRegellemmy.worldaggelalex@lemmy.world to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 1 year agomessage-square19fedilink
minus-squaresaltnotsugar@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up48·1 year agoWe now know that cars are not an effective anti-submarine countermeasure.
minus-squareeu@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up37·1 year agoNo, too many variables. We only know that a Volvo PV544 isn’t effective against that particular Swedish submarine. We now need to crash several different cars against several different submarines several times, for science!
minus-squareSkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up10·1 year agoWhat do you mean they had to scrap the submarine
minus-squareRose Thorne(She/Her)@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up7·1 year agoNo, no. You just need to up the acceleration. Strap some rockets to that bastard, and let 'em go again.
We now know that cars are not an effective anti-submarine countermeasure.
No, too many variables. We only know that a Volvo PV544 isn’t effective against that particular Swedish submarine. We now need to crash several different cars against several different submarines several times, for science!
What do you mean they had to scrap the submarine
No, no. You just need to up the acceleration.
Strap some rockets to that bastard, and let 'em go again.