• Alex@feddit.ro
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    This seems really cool!

    But dynamic linking saves space AFAIK

    • Takios@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      It also makes updating easier. When a lib has a bug it can be fixed by updating one package. If every application on your system was statically linked, each one of these would have to be updated individually.

      • Alex@feddit.ro
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        But then you definitely wouldn’t have errors with different apps requiring different versions of the same library.

        • woelkchen@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          11 months ago

          But then you definitely wouldn’t have errors with different apps requiring different versions of the same library.

          That’s why libfoo.so.1.2.3, libfoo.so.1.2.4, libfoo.so.1.3.9, etc. exist. Flatpak also exists. Just link to a specific version of a freedesktop.org Runtime.

    • woelkchen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      But dynamic linking saves space AFAIK

      Yes, it does and while I’m not a pedant about saving every possible byte in a time of terabyte SSDs, static linking everything is just insanely wasteful.