• terath@sh.itjust.worksOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    11 months ago

    I strongly disagree, these driving tests do nothing for promoting safety, and everything for minor rule following. In some cases what they teach is actually less safe. Like having to waggle your head around to “show the tester you are looking” or not using backup cameras and other driver aids.

    If we want to increase safety we should send people to skid school periodically, not retest them on useless easily abused by testers items. Also we should invest more heavily in public transit. I’d far rather see money go to public transit then further enable these private testing facilities to let their poorly trained testers continue abusing people trying to get their license and learn actual practical skills.

    • lud@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      I mean, you could also improve the tests…

    • Peppycito@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Skid school is a fabulous idea! Let’s promote skills and knowledge instead of being a punitory society.

      • ikidd@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        11 months ago

        Then how would they sell BMWs? Everyone knows signal lights aren’t standard equipment on those.

      • terath@sh.itjust.worksOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        It’s a valid question. Honestly, getting rid of the test and instead authorizing driving schools to approve people as ready to graduate would likely be a fair better solution. The driving instructors spend much more time with students and thus are far better situated to judge if they are ready.