That’s a lot of cash money. I’m still a bit confused at how much of this money will go to the actual engine and how much of it will go to supporting W4 in general, such as allowing devs to publish Godot games for consoles.

  • NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    11 months ago

    Does seem like a bit of a conflict to me when their whole business is porting Godot games, which means they have a vested interesting in keeping it that way.

    • SpaceMan9000@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      11 months ago

      There are other companies which have the same business model. The Godot Foundation is what actually moves the FOSS engine forward. Unfortunately it is not possible for the foundation to provide console support.

      • NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        Unreal engine does it, and I’m pretty sure Unity does as well, though you have to actually pay for licensing and acquire the dev kits themselves. But the support is built into the engine to compile for those platforms once the right compiler is there.

        • tabular@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          Unity/Unreal can talk business with Microsoft/Sony/Nintendo in a way standalone Godot engine cannot, and should not.

          Unity is proprietary and Unreal is source-available; the companies have direct control over how you redistribute their engine (to collect funding). Agreements can be made between them and the console manufacturers. Godot engine is open source (MIT) and appeals to a different kind of game dev, where including proprietary code that requires a license would be an unusual juxtaposition to say the least. If consoles support is important to you then perhaps there is no issue but for others that is repulsive.

          It gives unjust power over the devs (think in terms of the recent Unity fee fiasco). I wouldn’t contribute to a proprietary project (that’s just doing free work for a company) but I’d be honored if an open source project considered my contribution worth something to them.

          • NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            11 months ago

            That’s great, you’re just locking a large majority of Indie devs away from Godot forcing them to choose an engine that supports pc, and consoles.

              • NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                11 months ago

                I mean, I’m an Indie dev. I’ve tried all three engine, Godot, Unreal, and Unity, and I just don’t think Godot is there yet. I used it for almost 2 years before giving it up for Unreal, and I came back and tried Godot 4.0 for a few months. It’s a reality that kind of sucks. But I’m going to wait a few more years for Godot to catch up before I try to dip my toe back in.

              • tabular@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                11 months ago

                I don’t like the modern gaming industry. It is my hope that one day the norm will be free (libre) software games, using free engines.