• shrugal@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    75
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    We need to stop calling it digital “ownership”! You don’t get to own anything as a customer on these platforms, because rights that can be taken away on a whim are no rights at all.

    • Dudewitbow@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 year ago

      In the case of pc platforms like GOG, and itchio, if you get a drm free version of a title, theres nothing the company can do to both stop you from storing it on an external storage (or multiple) if you wanted. They wouldnt be able to revoke it if its a single player game.

        • Kissaki@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          What makes you say so?

          GoG about page explicitly talks about owning, and terms even explicitly mention advance notification so you can download Dr free versions if they will ever become unavailable.

          GoG terms do not qualify purchases as temporary access licenses - only to the degree of servicing downloads as long as possible and without other limitation.

          We don’t believe in controlling you and your games. Here, you won’t be locked out of titles you paid for, or constantly asked to prove you own them - this is DRM-free gaming.

          • RaoulDook@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            You know that’s the exception to the general trend though right? GoG has good terms, most others do not.

            Physical media still is a better way to go than digital whenever possible.

            • Kissaki@feddit.de
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Commenter specifically talked about gog and itch. Other commenter then replied you wouldn’t own it [there].

              The comment chain specifically moved away from “general trend”.

    • Kissaki@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      because rights that can be taken away on a whim are no rights at all

      They’re rights to temporary access. A contacted temporary right.

      I agree with your main point that it’s not ownership though.

      • shrugal@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        What you’re talking about is being allowed to use something or being tolerated, that’s different from having a right. A temporary right is a real right for a specified time frame, but here it would just be “until I decide you don’t”.