BrikoX@lemmy.zipM to Technology@lemmy.zipEnglish · 11 months agoJudge: Amazon “cannot claim shock” that bathroom spycams were used as advertisedarstechnica.comexternal-linkmessage-square5fedilinkarrow-up1140arrow-down10cross-posted to: news@lemmy.worldtechnology@lemmy.worldtechnology@lemmit.onlinehackernews@lemmy.smeargle.fanshackernews@derp.foo
arrow-up1140arrow-down1external-linkJudge: Amazon “cannot claim shock” that bathroom spycams were used as advertisedarstechnica.comBrikoX@lemmy.zipM to Technology@lemmy.zipEnglish · 11 months agomessage-square5fedilinkcross-posted to: news@lemmy.worldtechnology@lemmy.worldtechnology@lemmit.onlinehackernews@lemmy.smeargle.fanshackernews@derp.foo
minus-squarecan@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up18·edit-211 months ago Amazon could also be ordered to stop selling the spycam used to harm the plaintiff and any products considered “identical” to that spycam They haven’t already done so? Afraid it will make them look guilty or something?
They haven’t already done so? Afraid it will make them look guilty or something?