like I went to taco bell and they didn’t even have napkins out. they had the other stuff just no napkins, I assume because some fucking ghoul noticed people liked taking them for their cars so now we just don’t get napkins! so they can save $100 per quarter rather than provide the barest minimum quality of life features.

  • satanmat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Yep.

    Corporations have a fiduciary responsibility to their shareholders. They have to make money. And how much money do they have to earn? MORE.

    To grow, they offer good food at a reasonable price. It seems cheaper to put the drink machine out for customers to make their own drinks choices… but then we need those extra pennies, so behind the counter it goes, so customers don’t get free refills… then how can we source cheaper stuff, beef beans etc. there will be c constant demand to squeeze every penny from the system… Bob is making too much; better fsck his schedule until he quits so we can hire Alice as she make only minimum wage.

    I’m not sure where napkins fall in the chain but yes the quality likely will continue to spiral down.

    There are very few companies who recognize that there is a quality floor they should not go below. Where they acknowledge that we can’t get any worse, but they have to raise prices. And depending on the managers this cycle will continue back and forth

    • Couplqnd@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Can we stop with the myth that “corporations/board members have a fiduciary duty to share holders for maximum profit”

      It’s not true and never has been! It’s just some bullshit that was said in the 80s that sounds good but has no basis in reality