ediculous@feddit.nl to Asklemmy@lemmy.ml · 1 year agoPeople have been cleaning their ears with cotton swabs for years. What other tools are being inadvertently used wrong?message-squaremessage-square99fedilinkarrow-up116arrow-down12
arrow-up114arrow-down1message-squarePeople have been cleaning their ears with cotton swabs for years. What other tools are being inadvertently used wrong?ediculous@feddit.nl to Asklemmy@lemmy.ml · 1 year agomessage-square99fedilink
minus-squareCall me Lenny/Leni@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·1 year agoI’m surprised no place uses IP addresses anymore to authenticate (I was around when Postopia did or whatever that candy themed game place was). Many IP-ban when it comes to identifying rulebreakers, you’d think they’d IP-authenticate too.
minus-squarevzq@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 year agoAll major services do risk based authentication these days. I’m fairly certain network address factors into the risk calculations.
minus-squareahal@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoImagine if your roommate could just get into all your accounts?
minus-squaremackwinston@feddit.uklinkfedilinkarrow-up0·1 year agoCarrier grade NAT. For instance, on our local mobile phone network, thousands of handsets will have the same public IP address.
I’m surprised no place uses IP addresses anymore to authenticate (I was around when Postopia did or whatever that candy themed game place was). Many IP-ban when it comes to identifying rulebreakers, you’d think they’d IP-authenticate too.
All major services do risk based authentication these days. I’m fairly certain network address factors into the risk calculations.
Imagine if your roommate could just get into all your accounts?
Carrier grade NAT. For instance, on our local mobile phone network, thousands of handsets will have the same public IP address.