• Facehugger_35@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    The system-wide FSR is FSR1. FSR2 has to be implemented on a per game basis by the devs.

    FSR3 is half and half. I think there’s a systemwide implementation of it (that isn’t available on either SteamOS or Windows AFAIK), and there’s also a per-game implementation of it (that isn’t available on SteamOS yet, but does work on Deck hardware running windows).

    • AmeliaBuns@alien.topOPB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      oooh that’s sad,

      I only found horizon zero dawn to let me use FSR so far but it’s sharpening is awful.

      fsr 1.0 isn’t half bad tho

      • Sea-Garlic9074@alien.topB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        To get the most out of FSR, you have to lower the resolution so that it can upscale it and you have to fiddle around with settings until you get it to look as close to native as possible.

    • chrisdpratt@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      FSR 3 doesn’t have a system wide implementation. It’s in pipeline just like FSR 2. FSR 1 is the only version that can be applied at a system level, specifically because it’s an output filter, not part of the render pipeline.

      There may be something in the Adrenaline software for AMD GPUs that allows applying some portion of FSR 3. I have an Nvidia card, so I can’t speak to that, but it would have to be using some form of injection, such as the Anti-Lag feature AMD tried to offer and then pulled, because it ended up getting people banned for triggering anticheat. That’s only possible at a driver level, though.

    • AmeliaBuns@alien.topOPB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      huh i downloaded deep rock galactic just to try fsr 2.0… is it just me or does it look worse? lots of shimmering and stuff at ultra quality vs fsr in the steam menu

      • PhattyR6@alien.topB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Yeah that’s pretty much the standard you can expect for FSR, 1.0 or 2.X.

        It’s not great, generally. Can be okay or even good when working with high resolutions, like 4K. Passable at best at 1440p. Just bad at 1080p and it gets worse the lower the resolution goes.

        At 720p/800p like on the Deck, I only use it when the only option is FSR 2.X, I use the ultra quality preset, and only when I absolutely need to squeeze out extra performance.

  • Areinu@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    FSR1 takes output image and uses AI to upscale it. As such it can be used from the system.

    FSR2 is part of rendering pipeline of the game. It takes “movement vectors” that games provide to predict how pixels will look in the upscale, thus in general being more truthful to the expectation. This also means you can only get it from within the game.

    FSR1 gives out watery paint look when used. FSR2 can introduce shimmering, especially in rapid movements. Ideally you should only use FSR with the quality preset on SD. Quality upscales from 480p to 720p, while performance uses 360p as base. The lower you go the less pixels it will have to figure out the final image and the worse it will look.

  • Bumppxd@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    FSR from the overlay is systemwide and uses FSR 1. FSR 2 and only available through in game settings normally and is game specific