• cannibalkitteh@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    1 year ago

    That episode always kinda bothered me, because the universal translator was able to make English phrases out of it, which suggests a base language that would have to exist for the Tamarians themselves to understand their language. Surely, they could have shared some set of learning matirials that they would use to educate their young?

    • NaibofTabr@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      1 year ago

      How would the Tamarians ever develop any advanced technology? Can you imagine an engineering discussion in Tamarian? Like, what is the word for capacitor? “Edward, when he enclosed conductive foil and electrolyte in a metal cylinder”? What would a Tamarian technical manual even look like?

      • morhp@lemmy.wtf
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        I mean, they seem to have basic grammar for items and people and actions (“eyes”, “walls”, “fell”), it’s possible that they only use that weird allegory reference pattern when speaking formally to strangers or whatever. It’s also possible that their language in the original version makes more sense and is more practical and it just gets mangled by the universal translator.

        • Olgratin_Magmatoe@startrek.website
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          it’s possible that they only use that weird allegory reference pattern when speaking formally to strangers or whatever

          It seems like an awfully bad idea to use a communication method that doesn’t transfer what you mean if you have a better option available.

          It’s also possible that their language in the original version makes more sense and is more practical and it just gets mangled by the universal translator.

          I doubt that’s the case. I don’t see how a non-metaphor based language would get turned into a metaphor based one through a software bug. Some big hand waving would need to happen for that.

          IMO the Tamarians probably have brains that are structurally different such that their metaphors come far more naturally.

    • Olgratin_Magmatoe@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      They may have tried that in the past to no avail. The episode specifically mentions there was several failed attempts at first contact.

      A guide only works if you understand the guide. Think of it like this, if I sent you all 1679 ones and zeros from the arecibo message to you, but you didn’t understand the concept of zero, you’d have a hard time understanding what the message meant, even if the message itself was self explanatory.

      Their language isn’t just grammatically different, it is uses a fundamentally different structure, and the Tamarian brain might be structurally different as well, able to easily account for language when young. So there may not be much of a “base language” that the metaphors are built on so to speak.

    • rtxn@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      “Our communication happens through references to well-documented historical events and figures, but still uses the same vocabulary and grammar as the federation and most of the galaxy’s civilizations. Maybe we should share a short summary with the captain, to assist in establishing relations.”

      “No! I wanna wrassle the monster like Darmok and Jalad!”

    • Zellith@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      They should have sent the federation their history books. The only thing missing from the language is context. The fact that they speak in metaphors means that these stories exist somewhere for them to be referenced.

      • flicker@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        The thing is… do they? We don’t know that they’re actually referencing anything at all. I always thought that, once you got the vibe, you could contribute to the conversation with the phrasing and use the implied story of the phrase for the context.

        I might say to you, “Kyle, when Janet left him.” You don’t need to know who Kyle or Janet are to infer that this might not be a good thing. Alternatively, I might say that, and mime like I’m wiping sweat from my brow as of relieved, and it might change the meaning.

        We have no real way of knowing what history they might be referring to. Or if there even is one.

    • Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      frankly i feel that most social species should be able to create a pidgin even if they have basically nothing else in common.

      like… if we can communicate basic things with bears and deer, i think the idea that we somehow wouldn’t be able to communicate at all with aliens is a bit wack