• Tommyatthedoor@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    To be clear this is the reason this person has put as the reason they got fined, the whole report is more detailed than this.

  • Nicorni0@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    Meanwhile, clubs like city, Chelsea, PSG, and others, spending billions…fck uefa/fifa

  • BigMikeAshley@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    1890/91 is correct. GK Ned Doig’s 8th game for the club (vs WBA) and somehow wasn’t registered.

    Fun fact: He was shy about his baldness, and if his cap fell off during a match, he would collect his cap first, rather than stick to playing the game. He played 400+ appearances

  • OverallLocksmith9351@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    im infuriated how a team facing a relegation battle last season got charged before Chelsea and city. Both of them are facing charges that should easily get them relegated when in comparison to this

  • SmileySadFace@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    This is a dumbass precedent to set. Now it is either City and Chelsea get relegated or the lesson is if you are going to go over FFP you might as well get your money’s worth and go nuts.

  • drjet196@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    Amazing how professional the league already was in 1890 to punish a team for an unregistered player. I thought they would‘ve got some guys from the pub as subs until like 1950.