• Digital_warrior007@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    As far as I know, the graphics performance of MTL 6+8+2 28W is about 30% better than 780M in synthetic benchmarks and about 10 to 15% in gaming. Gaming depends on driver optimization. Power consumption is also slightly higher than 780M but by a small margin.

  • ShaidarHaran2@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I thought it could do better than the 780M based on the promised gain over where they were honestly. But Intel is still in their era of rapidly improving performance with drivers too.

  • EmilMR@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is going be a lot more common and abundant on the market than 780m at least.

  • AlNeutonne@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    So it just matches the 7840hs that was released in january? Thats a bit disappointing considering the hype this thing has gotten. Unless its matching at 15w then thats nice, but i have my doubts

    • Digital_warrior007@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      7840hs was launched in January but was a paper launch. Laptops based on that started selling just couple of months back. I’m not sure about this specific test, but in general, MTL igpu beats phoenix igpu by a decent margin.