• Wide_Challenge3880@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    It depends on how you judge managers.

    For a club the size of Villa, I think there is a really strong argument for Emery being the third best manager.

    However, the comparison with Arteta is too easy to make and it doesn’t seem he could rebuild a club in his image like Arteta has done and like United need to do

    • TeddyMMR@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      it doesn’t seem he could rebuild a club in his image like Arteta has done and like United need to do

      Based on what? He was giving basically a season and a half at Arsenal, it took Arteta 3 to rebuild the squad. He finished 8th twice in the same time Emery was given there with basically the same squad?

      Mourinho also struggled to rebuild United but he had arguably two of the best rebuilds in history at Chelsea and Real.

      • kucharssim@alien.topB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        He was given only a season and a half because after a strong start where the football did not pass the eye test but delivered results, eventually things evened out and we bottled a 4th place finish in his first season. After that we were playing the worst football I have ever witnessed Arsenal play, and were in the bottom half of the table by the time he was sacked in his second season. Arteta took over and immediately made the team play better, moved us a couple of spots up in the table to finish 8th and won an FA cup.

        I don’t blame him for everything as there was too much shit going on at the club when he was there, but he really did not do that well for Arsenal, it was just not a good fit.