• D33lix@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Good job intel. Thx for software locking my 3 months old 13th gen CPU.
    After this, I don’t think i will buy a team Blue solution ever again.
    At least with Nvidia FG lock exclusively to 4000 series, there is a hardware reason so it’s swallowable.
    Software locking is not.

      • sylfy@alien.topB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Who needs E cores when you can pull the same benchmarks as Intel at 2/3s the power?

          • No_Shoe954@alien.topB
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I mean the 7800x3D trades blows with the 13900k, while using 2/3rds the power or even less in some instances.

    • Torrey187@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I have a genuine question. Would people feel better if they just dropped APO support entirely for all CPUs and just said screw it ?

      • distractal@alien.topB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        No. Why would I take away someone else’s performance because Intel is being anti-consumer?

      • buddybd@alien.topB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        So what would that leave us with, no APO at all? People wouldn’t be happy or unhappy because it doesn’t exist.

        The point is it can be easily implemented into the previous generations and doesn’t need to be a USP for 14th gen. Is it even a USP for 14th gen? Cause with 2 game support, that too not even the leading MP games, it doesn’t mean much right now.

    • Kriptic_TKM@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Frame gen could be used with older gpus just a question if nshitia wants it, looking at you far 3 hoping you finally release

      • inqisitor_euro@alien.topB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Nope.

        Nvidia and AMD’s frame gen work completely differently, AMD for the most part uses software, Nvidia’s is mainly all hardware based.

        The optical flow accelerator inside Ada is roughly 4-5 times faster than the OFA in Ampere, Using the OFA in Ampere to do FG wouldn’t give any performance uplift, It would infact result in a performance penalty. An Nvidia engineer spoke about this when frame gen was first shown and said eventually they may be able to make it work on 3000 series but the uplift would be absolutely minuscule to non existent… but as per usual with lunatics on the internet he was called names, Threatened with violence, Murder etc etc… which is why we generally don’t have experts interacting with the public anywhere near as much as we would like.

    • szczszqweqwe@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Never say never.

      While it’s a dumb move from Intel (they have serious competitor) now it’s time for customers and reviewers to be vocal, AMD tried shenanigans with AM4, but we won, now it’s time for Intel.

      • Kryo8888@alien.topB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Sorry for being ignorant but what are the AM4 shenanigans you are talking about?