He was at arsenal on loan at the age of 22 with no pl experience compared to havertz on 65m at the age of 24 with 3 years of pl experience being average… It’s not havertz is a bad player it’s more of havertz is a bad signing… If he was a 25-30m signing brought to add depth to the squad due to his versality complete different story and he is going to be that once the players are fit