Pretty much the subject line. uBO has successfully blocked the nag screen enough times that I can’t play anything at this point. No preview loads, and the play button serves no function. I’d really prefer not to have to find content on YT, copy the URL and use Piped/Invidious, but this ongoing escalation is steeling my resolve to screw Google.

  • FlumPHP@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    1 year ago

    You could pay for the service with cash instead of ad views. Works on all devices without having to set up an adblocking VPN or Pi-Hole.

    • anothermember@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      1 year ago

      I don’t think you can be sure they’re not profiling you for advertising on other sites just because they’re not showing ads on YouTube. The purpose of uBO is security. Plus I wouldn’t give money to a shady company like Google anyway.

      • clgoh@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I hope you are contributing to the content creators in other ways, then.

        • anothermember@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I am, as it happens, but I don’t feel under any obligation to.

          Firstly, how they get paid is a private matter between them and YouTube, they signed their contracts, not me.

          Secondly, YouTube could run privacy-respecting non-targeted ads. I’m not punishing YouTube for having ads, I’m punishing them for being spyware.

          • anothermember@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Correct, if they weren’t user-hostile, it would have been more likely I would have built up some good-will towards them and would be happy to pay.

    • pkulak@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      That’s what I do. Works great. Or don’t pay and don’t use it. Crazy talk, I know!

      • 4dpuzzle@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Congratulations on doing your part in helping a filthy spyware company ruin the web for everyone with their corruption of browsers and the web standards.

        • pkulak@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I never use Chrome or anything Chromium based. You sound like you use Brave.

          But if someone offers me an entertainment service at a price, I pay, or don’t use it. You’re not some noble pirate, you’re just a cheap ass who wants to consume other people’s hard work for free.

          • 4dpuzzle@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            You sound like you use Brave.

            You assumed wrong.

            But if someone offers me an entertainment service at a price, I pay, or don’t use it.

            Oh boy! Another one with the comprehension skills of a mole rat! Where did I say don’t pay the artist? What I don’t like is the pimp middleman in between.

            You’re not some noble pirate, you’re just a cheap ass who wants to consume other people’s hard work for free.

            Says the shill who parrots the words of an abusive and corrupt corporation. Go look at the mirror and call them cheap ass. You are just a self-righteous idiot who helps monopolies gain control over ordinary people, including the artists you supposedly support. Moron!

    • 4dpuzzle@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      For everyone who feels righteous by paying YouTube for content, here are some things to consider:

      1. A part of your payment goes to Google - who is involved in unethical and often illegal subversion of privacy and user rights on the internet by corruption of the very foundations of the web.

      2. They’re coming up with their ‘content is not free’ argument after they’ve killed off all their competitors. They’re in a position to demand because they played a bait-and-switch and succeeded in it.

      I’m not against paid services, and especially not against paying the content creators. But when you pay a crook for their services, you bear responsibility for their actions.

    • gk99@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Family plan split three ways comes out to about $7 a person per month, if I’m remembering right.