Even if your car is from the same brand as the dealership, they may not be equipped to service it. At what point does that become reasonable? Just how old is too old?

For example, Mazda rotaries are infamous for being unservicable at Mazda dealerships, even when the RX-8 was barely a decade old.

  • AdmirableGears@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    The trick I learned years ago was not to bring my car to dealerships that weren’t around to sell my car new.

  • squirrel8296@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m only aware of 3 situations where dealerships service classics today along with 2 others that used to but don’t anymore:

    1. The Corvette. It’s GM’s halo car so it gets a certain level of white glove treatment that others do not. It’s also still possible to get any part needed for a Corvette directly from GM.
    2. Porsche. Any part can be ordered directly from Porsche for any vehicle they’ve ever sold and they have infotainment upgrades (among other upgrades) available for pretty old Porsche vehicles. They even give a pretty steep discount on regular maintenance to keep owners coming back.
    3. Jeep dealerships. I’m talking the ones that have been Jeep dealerships forever, like pre-AMC ownership. Many of those dealerships happily service classic Jeeps and even buy and sell them.
    4. Mercedes-Benz used to by on the same level as Porsche, and there are plenty of owners of old Mercedes-Benz vehicles who still take them to the dealership, but they don’t encourage it like they used to. Part of it is that their build quality took such a nose dive in the late 90s/early 00s that it became a major headache for a lot of service departments.
    5. Volvo used to encourage owners to dealership maintain their vehicles in perpetuity. Once Volvo decided to take on the full prestige luxury brands (like Mercedes-Benz, Lexus, BMW, etc.) they immediately stopped servicing vehicles over a certain age. In their view having a bare bones 240 or 850 right next to an XC90 Recharge didn’t send the right message to potential buyers.
    • NovelPolicy5557@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      In their view having a bare bones 240 or 850 right next to an XC90 Recharge didn’t send the right message to potential buyers.

      But that’s kind of weird, right?

      I mean, Volvos have never been cheap cars. I remember that in the 80’s the 240 was popular among doctors and dentists and other upper-middle class professionals who were more into safety than performance. Same with the 850 in the 90’s.

      With a starting MSRP of ~$75k, the XC90 in firmly in upper-middle class territory… it’s much more “mass affluent” than “aspirational”.