Could be. TBH it did sound silly from the first place that they opted for 64gb eMMC instead of actual SSD, when it was in fact just an NVMe drive that has eMMC module instead of NAND flash dies. They probably had to go extra length to procure these wierd storages instead of just buyng 64gb SSDs which were already cheap.
Could be. TBH it did sound silly from the first place that they opted for 64gb eMMC instead of actual SSD, when it was in fact just an NVMe drive that has eMMC module instead of NAND flash dies. They probably had to go extra length to procure these wierd storages instead of just buyng 64gb SSDs which were already cheap.
eMMC is solid state drive. it has no moving parts.
In that regard it is no different from NVMe. Especially since the most common NVMe form factor (M.2) is fundamentally incompatible with rustspinners.
U.2 could theoretically host a rustspinner inside but no one would bother with that vs. SAS or SATA.