• Negapirate@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Is this any good? Daniel Owen tiptoed around saying it’s basically a useless tech demo and that was with antilag+ which has now been removed after getting people banned. He said the framerates inconsistency and juddering from turning on and off made it pretty useless.

    • bubblesort33@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Spiky frame rate I think it’s actually worse than a consistent low frame rate. I’d rather be stuck at 40fps constantly than go from 35 to 70 back and forth every few seconds.

      Your mind adjusts to 40 and it becomes usable. Constant fluctuations are a mess.

      • bogusbrunch@alien.top
        cake
        B
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah that’s what I thought too. There’s a serious core issue with constant massive shifts in framerate. On top of the frame time inconsistency we have artifacting and increased input lag.

        Until AMD gets it to not constantly turn off and on I think it’s largely a tech demo. I’m sure there’s some extreme niche uses but I think the overall value here is pretty low and it’s not really compelling as a consumer.

    • uzzi38@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Frametime consistency was fixed with the last driver already.

      None of the better YT GPU reviewers seem to have looked at that improved release though, so nobody’s really judged it properly.

      • Sipas@alien.topB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Frametime consistency was fixed with the last driver already.

        Maybe improved, but is it really fixed? I tried this at A Plague Tale Requiem and it doesn’t feel very fluid with a base frame rate of 70-80.