The poll found 50% of Democrats approve of how Biden has navigated the conflict while 46% disapprove — and the two groups diverge substantially in their views of U.S. support for Israel. Biden’s support on the issue among Democrats is down slightly from August, as an AP-NORC poll conducted then found that 57% of Democrats approved of his handling of the conflict and 40% disapproved.

  • APassenger@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    11 months ago

    I wish you weren’t getting down votes. This situation is pushing more people into that space. Or just suppressing enthusiasm which will turn into fewer votes.

    I get that this instance/Lemmy doesn’t like that, and I get the sense this instance is entitled to votes from any non-white, non-male, but… Reality is more complicated and everyone gets agency. That’s part of the foundations of treating people with respect, I thought.

    • SmashingSquid@notyour.rodeo
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      They’re getting downvoted for the last sentence. After all the infighting, the insurrection, trying to remove people’s rights, defending criminals, etc if both parties look anywhere close to the same to you then you are not actually paying attention.

      • PugJesus@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Why would they worry about the lives of us poors when they can be smug about “both sides”?

      • APassenger@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        Down votes persuasive value is often 0. Sometimes even negative.

        A thoughtful response goes much further.

        Lemmy aspires to be more wholesome version of other social media. It often fails.

        • PhlubbaDubba@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          Well duh it was founded by tankies, their “more wholesome” is not banning people who think “the libs get the wall too” is a reasonable position even among the far left.

      • APassenger@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        Okay, it’s been a few hours and I think the thread will be quieter now.

        Read or don’t. I know you owe me nothing.

        My thinking, and I think the down votes bear this out, is there is a very large gap between experiences and perspectives.

        If a person is comfortable and believes either the institutions will prevail, bad dem behavior can’t go unpunished, or fascism may benefit them - or not harm… all of these allow for a more easy path to considering not voting for a Democrat (or at all). It need not even be consciously thought.

        Meanwhile I’ve seen some Lemmings lose their mind about things they are entitled to. Like YouTube without ads, FOSS (where their version of the F is literally free), apps for lemmy, and politics. There is a vein of entitlement to free things and to others’ votes.

        It’s not everyone, it’s not close to everyone. But it is disproportionate to my life outside of this space.

        And instead of discussing the urgency of the situation, the role of empathy in seeing that fascism is bigger than just whether it directly harms you or not… Its a dosing of down votes for not aligning.

        For me, this is putting me off sympathy for those struggling - even if I am one. It just looks entitled and not like a cry for help. Even if that’s what it is underneath it all.

        Raw, near panicked desperation that the country and the world will all fall to pieces and the elders and privileged won’t even give fuckall. They got theirs, you get yours.

        It’s complicated. Or maybe I just think this wrong. But I’ve never seen so many people lose their minds so easily as I see it here. This place breeds anxiety and anger.

        I’m evaluating the wisdom of using lemmy, personally.

          • APassenger@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            Reddit is my reference point, but I understand only those who think in specific ways were likely to jump (e.g. Moral clarity around API, spez, moderation/permitted acts).

            So it was a subset of reddit (not representative) that joined lemmy, which is also not representative.

            What I think I see is what I’ve described elsewhere: white males realizing the tide went out for them, too. Then, not realizing that they have unchecked privilege, acting out and acting like they can tell people how to vote or to vote, how to run their app, run their service, etc.

            It is either entitlement, privilege or both. It’s, for me, the most off putting thing since I joined. Not simply this thread, but many others.

            Let me add, I’m not Mr Lawnorder. I just think, historically, complaining and demanding doesn’t change things, nor is it persuausive. And the specifics of the acts matter. Strikes work. Boycotts may. Streaming around ads… Will not work except to provide content for free to a user for a while, at the detriment of YT and the content creator. I believe it also hardens an attitude that seeps into other parts of life.

        • theneverfox@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          Here’s how I see it - we’re all fucked, as a species, and yet no seems to feel any urgency. There’s no compromising with reality, but the Democrats do nothing but compromise between the rosy picture the populace generally believes in, and the imaginary world Republicans paint

          Many Republicans are quite literally fascists. They’ll tear down the system to extend their time in power. They’ll pick one enemy after another, and impose their way of living on us.

          Biden is progressive for a neo-liberal. That means he’ll occasionally do something good, but mostly just keep the status quo.

          We need to be making large, sweeping changes. IDGAF about YouTube - I care about what it means. YouTube blocking ads is no different than my grocery bill going up by 30%, or search results sucking so bad knowledge becomes unfindable.

          It’s late stage capitalism - we’re being pushed into the age of techno-fuedalism. Instead of physical ownership, we’re being locked into virtual fiefs where companies tax us and control the information we’re exposed to.

          That’s the issue here - free access to information is a big fucking deal. If YouTube shut down, I’d be sad… But it’s not nearly as big a deal as YouTube demonstrating disdain for both users and law.

          IDK… This is all very interrelated in complex ways. This probably comes off as a rant, but these things are intimately interconnected. Basically, these are all symptoms of the same existential threat to our species.

          I can’t explain it all briefly - you have to think systematically, and that’s more of a college course than an essay, let alone a comment. But if nothing else, remember how systems die, from computers to a human body… They sputter, and then collapse all at once. These are sputters. The global just-in-time supply chain snapping will be the collapse… Whether it comes from a natural disaster or because too many workers become desperate enough to fight, this is a civilization level problem

          • SCB@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            11 months ago

            That’s the issue here - free access to information is a big fucking deal.

            “So anyway, I block YouTube ads” lol

                • theneverfox@pawb.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  11 months ago

                  It’s telling about one of us alright…

                  I’m not sure if you think “free” here means without paying, or if you don’t understand the difference between the ability to access information and the ability to force others to view information

                  • SCB@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    11 months ago

                    “information should be free”

                    “Here’s this massive source of literally all the information that could ever exist.”

                    “People should have to pay for that because I don’t want to watch ads.”

                    Now you’re violating both versions of “free” by both creating a closed system where before it was not and requiring a barrier of entry most won’t overcome.

      • APassenger@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        11 months ago

        They don’t want to hear it and don’t want that narrative to gain traction.

        The response with Horseshoe theory in it is a good one and a better response than mine, or down votes.