Now how many are utter psychopaths (or “just” people without empathy)?
They’re an evil bunch and that’s about it IMO. Don’t kill them or anything but being able to have already a Billion dollars is just breaking our social contract, so tax that away from them. They can argue who’s got 56 millions instead of 56 billions, for them it will be the same game.
We’d have to stop demanding the money for it to become worthless. Again, no contract would be broken, because not wanting something does not require a multi party agreement. Anyone can unilaterally decide not to want something.
Now how many are utter psychopaths (or “just” people without empathy)?
They’re an evil bunch and that’s about it IMO. Don’t kill them or anything but being able to have already a Billion dollars is just breaking our social contract, so tax that away from them. They can argue who’s got 56 millions instead of 56 billions, for them it will be the same game.
A contract requires at least 2 party consent. A “social contract” is more like a ransom.
Well if we decide we don’t accept the contract then their money is worthless so…
We’d have to stop demanding the money for it to become worthless. Again, no contract would be broken, because not wanting something does not require a multi party agreement. Anyone can unilaterally decide not to want something.
I don’t think we’re really discussing the same thing :-/
No, we don’t. I think we’re finally getting somewhere!