A year after promising viewers a “red tsunami” in the 2022 midterms, only to be left with egg on their faces after the GOP drastically underperformed, Fox News was once again wondering what went wrong after Democrats romped to victory in statewide elections on Tuesday night.

Despite recent polls showing President Joe Biden deeply underwater with voters and even losing to Donald Trump in several battleground states, the Democratic incumbent governor easily won victory over his MAGA-endorsed opponent in deep-red Kentucky. And over in Ohio, a state Trump won by eight points in 2020, voters overwhelmingly passed an amendment ensuring access to abortion care in the state’s constitution.

The continued drag that undoing Roe v. Wade has had on the GOP was especially apparent in Virginia, where Republican Gov. Glenn Youngkin had promised to implement a 15-week abortion ban if the GOP was able to gain unified control over the state’s General Assembly. Instead, not only were Youngkin’s hopes of a Republican sweep dashed, but the Democrats now control both chambers.

  • MacGuffin94@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    58
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I still don’t think that the full impact of COVID is being accounted for in polling and voter outcomes. Yes the first wave hit blue areas hard and fast due to population density but with the vaccine and the ever growing amount of time it has been available I have to imagine it is almost exclusively hitting red areas now. COVID has not gone away but vaccinated people aren’t dying at nearly the rate of the unvaccinated of which that group is pretty exclusively GOP or at least Maga. When some of these elections were coming down to the thousands of voters 3 years ago what happens when thousands of dedicated GOP voters are now dead?

    • Sanity_in_Moderation@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      68
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I did the math a few years ago because I couldn’t find anyone else who had published it. This is rough and IANAM (mathmagicman).

      Every single day 8,000 boomers and above die, and 12,000 people turn 18 and those numbers are actually accelerating. If you use existing data to estimate conservative/liberal and likely voters within those groups it works out to a delta of 10,000 per day on a national scale. That’s 5,000 votes switching every single day. That might not seem like alot. Because it really isn’t. Out of 155 million votes cast, 10,000 is .006 percent. But here’s the thing. It’s cumulative. And it just doesn’t stop. It is relentless. it’s 300k a month, 3.6 million per year. And that pace is accelerating. Between 2020 and 2024 it’s a 15 million vote difference. By 2028 it’s 30 million. It used to be that people age into conservatism. But that is not happening with millennials. The demographics are changing, and changing quickly. The most conservative group in the country is dying. While the most liberal group is rising.

      We just have to hold on to democracy for a few more years. This will all be behind us. Another 10k today.

      • whofearsthenight@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        57
        ·
        1 year ago

        I have a feeling you “aged in to conservatism” because that’s when you finally had money and humans are generally shit when it comes to “fuck you I got mine” but speaking as a millennial, that’s just not happening. My generation’s retirement plan is to die at our desks hopefully in a way that creates a lot of work for our bosses. Although on the less cynical side of things, I also tend to think that generally people are becoming more tolerant over time.

        • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          20
          ·
          1 year ago

          For the most part I have aged into liberalism. Older I get and the more shit I have seen.

          Before: What do you mean institutional racism is a thing? I am not racist, no one I know is racist. Oh sure there are skinheads, but they are in jail. Since I don’t see it, it must not be there.

          Now: I just saw my friend who is black get treated like he was a dangerous criminal because of the crime of walking.

          Stuff like that for example. I am doing well, I got mine. I want everyone else to get there’s as well.

      • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        1 year ago

        It used to be that people age into conservatism

        It used to be that being conservative did not require you being batshit insane.

        Yes batshit insane conservatives existed, but so did reasonable people supporting reasonable sounding policies by conservative politicians who behaved in a respectable manner.

        While I believe it’s still possible for reasonable people to be Conservative, it’s not possible for reasonable people to support Republicans with their mouth pieces like Magorie “Jewish Space Lasers” Green being treated like someone with opinions worth listening to.

      • Railing5132@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        1 year ago

        Regarding the steadfast belief that “conservatism is dying”: no it isn’t. Christian schools, home schools, Christian colleges, and even regular schools, communities and colleges are pumping out kids that have the beliefs of their parents. I live in a rural area, and work (hypocritically) for a Christian based organization. I’m surrounded by young minds that are perfectly comfortable with the ideals of the religious right, and vote.

        Society has been saying it for years… We said it when I was back in college. “Bubba in the white house is going to be the best! We’ll undo all the hell Reagan and Bush did!” then Newt Gingrich (sounds like a disease…) made his “Promise to America™” and everything got fucked.

        • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          1 year ago

          I will say that the trend, year over year, for xtians has been they have been going down at roughly 1% per year, every year, for many years now. I think it is things like this that explain why the cons are getting increasingly radicalized in their positions and in their tactics. They have been denigrating the notion of democratic norms (the well-actually “this is not a democratic country” stuff that they love to pull, for instance). Their more wonky members starting laying the groundwork way, way back, according to McLean’s Democracy In Chains.

          https://www.pewresearch.org/religion/2022/09/13/modeling-the-future-of-religion-in-america/

          I mean, the fact that about 1 in 3 is unaffiliated is quite staggering. I can remember a time where even admitting this was seen as rather “edgy”, now it’s going to earn a shrug.

        • someguy3@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          1 year ago

          This is why they want religious schools, school vouchers, private schools, etc. It’s segregation light. This way they stay in their echo chamber.

          But the data shows religiousness is going down. The ones that remain are becoming more radical.

          This is also why they want Fox, to appeal to more than the religious.

    • Jesus_666@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      You need to keep in mind that 2023 COVID is a different beast than 2020 COVID. The currently most common strains tend to be less hard on the body as the virus has started to adapt to human hosts.

      I still wouldn’t recommend people to go unvaccinated but it’s not quite as suicidally irresponsible as it used to be. Still irresponsible, though.

      • roofuskit@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah, but the elderly GOP base is getting it for the 2nd or 3rd time without having been vaccinated. It’s just as hard on them if not harder.

        That said I don’t think it’s moving the needle as much as MAGA politics are.

        • derphurr@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          What bizarro world do you live in? It’s no longer a novel virus. Most boomers have been exposed or infected by COVID, also a great number (majority) of them got vaccinated. So by now there are miniscule number of boomers without natural or vaccine immunity. The vaccines boosters do little here in terms of death, because very few boomers are currently dying from COVID.

          Hospitalization rate of over 65 was

          16.4 per 100,000 during the week ending August 26 2023

          Death rate is a fraction of that.

      • Rhoeri@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        1 year ago

        We’ve been talking about this since COVID hit. They’re too fucking stupid to accept the truth.

        • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          I remember how the cons were cynically thinking it was going to hit the “urban” people harder and the worst among them were cheering that on. Whooooops.

          • Rhoeri@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            They’re always thinking that the world is more dumb than they are and hilariously never coming to the realization that it’s because they’re so dumb that they think that.

    • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      Everyone I know who was vaxxed and boosted told me it felt between a cold and the flu. Which granted not fun, but considering the alternative much better.

      • Serinus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        And it’s a hell of a lot better than long Covid, especially before we knew more about what the duck long Covid was going to look like.

        • SnipingNinja@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          You can still get long COVID even after being vaccinated (at least that’s what I’ve read) but it’s much less likely

    • SuperDuper@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      It also was and still is most fatal for older people, who generally lean more towards the Republican side.

    • athos77@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think there are also a couple more factors. In a time when early detection and treatment gets the best outcomes, the right-wingers are more likely to believe that it isn’t serious, so they’re less likely to test and less likely to try to get paxlovid (or be outside the 5-day grace period).

      And even if they know they’re sick early and want to get paxlovid, people who live in rural areas have less access to healthcare in general - and some of their doctors may not believe in paxlovid. Which really sucks for those people.

      All that said, the are definitely health care discrepancies for minorities, and those disproportionately affect Democrats (mostly).

    • someguy3@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Um polling is on the current population. Unless there’s a long, long pause between the poll and the vote it really won’t matter much.

      • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        Polling is on the current population of people who are willing to answer polls. If the poll is done by blind calling people what are the odds you would even answer the phone?

        • Serinus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          And people are less willing to give out data to an unknown entity than ever before.

          Previously you’d answer surveys because you wanted to be represented. Now you don’t answer surveys because you know it may just be used to target advertisements or messaging for your opponents.