News organizations are using cowardly words to describe killing abroad, fascism at home — downplaying the danger to democracy.

There was a shocking and incredibly important story on the front page of the New York Times last week. As reported by an A-team of journalists including two Pulitzer Prize winners, the Times warned its readers that Donald Trump — if returned to the White House in 2025 — is grooming a new team of extremist government lawyers who would be more loyal to their Dear Leader than to the rule of law, and could help Trump install a brand of American fascism.

You say you didn’t hear anything about this? That’s not surprising. The editors at the Times made sure to present this major report in the blandest, most inoffensive way possible — staying true to the mantra in the nation’s most influential newsroom that the 2024 election shouldn’t be covered any differently, even when U.S. democracy is on the line.

    • BabyWah@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yes, imagine being so deluded you even proudly make a website to proudly announce your fucked up plans and think people will be okay with it.

      • Sparlock@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        It serves to normalize the ideas and recruit more followers by advertising “we don’t think your ideas are reprehensible and you have a home here if you want it”

        It’s the digital equivalent of the old Uncle Sam posters “I want YOU for U.S. ARMY” but for fascists.