cm0002@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 1 month agoAI will replace programmerslemmy.mlimagemessage-square120linkfedilinkarrow-up173arrow-down17cross-posted to: programmerhumor@lemmy.ml
arrow-up166arrow-down1imageAI will replace programmerslemmy.mlcm0002@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 1 month agomessage-square120linkfedilinkcross-posted to: programmerhumor@lemmy.ml
minus-squaretoastmeister@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up0·1 month agoCould AI allow you to write code in python, and then turn the python into a static language with static variables at least?
minus-squareHonytawk@feddit.nllinkfedilinkarrow-up0·edit-21 month agoA language to do what? That is just programming with extra steps
minus-squarecx40@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·1 month agoBut the main benefits of static typing is in making the programming part easier. What do you gain from translating dynamically typed languages into a statically typed language?
minus-squaretoastmeister@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up0·1 month agoWell that can’t be true, why would anyone have ever made a dynamic typing system?
minus-squarecx40@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 month agoThat’s also to make programming easier. Different programmers have different needs.
Could AI allow you to write code in python, and then turn the python into a static language with static variables at least?
A language to do what?
That is just programming with extra steps
But the main benefits of static typing is in making the programming part easier. What do you gain from translating dynamically typed languages into a statically typed language?
Well that can’t be true, why would anyone have ever made a dynamic typing system?
That’s also to make programming easier. Different programmers have different needs.