• hglman@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I, a socialist, hate markets. They are simplistic and functional artifacts of the available way to pass information.

    • wewbull@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      So, you would never trade with someone else something you have for something they have? You want to be entirely self sufficient?

      If this isn’t true, why do think markets serve no purpose?

    • galloog1@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Cool, what is your preferred replacement and does everyone in this thread agree? You have managed to continue criticism but not offer a replacement yet again.

      • hglman@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        The ole can have criticism without perfect solutions response. Cool, how useless and pointless of you.

          • bloodfart@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            No, it broadens and deepens understanding.

            Alternatives come from that understanding. Criticism is the fundamental step towards alternatives.

            • agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              No, it broadens and deepens understanding

              How exactly do you come to that conclusion?

              Edit: “Thing bad” doesn’t broaden or deepen anything. “Thing has specific shortcomings which aren’t present in specific alternative to thing” is a useful criticism. Criticism without alternatives is just called complaining.