realitista@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 1 year agobut idk tholemmy.worldimagemessage-square38fedilinkarrow-up1870arrow-down115
arrow-up1855arrow-down1imagebut idk tholemmy.worldrealitista@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 1 year agomessage-square38fedilink
minus-square0ops@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up3·1 year agoWell only if “theoretically” is followed by a statement compatible with supported theory. Too many people confuse theory with hypothesis
minus-squareYAMAPIKARIYA@lemmyfi.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up11·1 year agoYou can easily get away with using “Theoretically” in every situation, hypothetically speaking.
minus-squareALostInquirer@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoWhere might hyporetically fall into this? Hyporetically speaking, for the real theothetists that might press the matter.
Well only if “theoretically” is followed by a statement compatible with supported theory. Too many people confuse theory with hypothesis
You can easily get away with using “Theoretically” in every situation, hypothetically speaking.
Where might hyporetically fall into this? Hyporetically speaking, for the real theothetists that might press the matter.