Yeah, for a government that’s hypothetically supposed to be encouraging better information security, creating more security exploits with bad legal frameworks suggests that they’re either lying about their intentions, or not as clever as people assumed. Malice or incompetence isn’t really the important part. That it’s a bad solution in the first place is.

Clueless or malicious legislation.

Or both, it can be both.

deleted by creator

C-22 is bullshit and dumb.
C-34 is also bullshit and dumb, but with “protect the kids” tacked on, itself almost indistinguishable from C-63.
Are they subcontracting their writing to Vic Toews or something? These feel like C-30 all over again.

I’m tired of this never-ending fight with the technologically-challenged bureaucrats trying to strip any remaining privacy and weakening everyone’s security in the process.
I don’t buy their shit reasoning as to why this would even be needed in the first place.

Being tired doesn’t mean I want to fold like they hope we all do though, itnjust makes me irritable and angry.