Fees of up to $0.20 per install threaten to upend large chunks of the industry.

  • DarkwinDuck@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    With how many companies started trying to move libre software to non libre licenses, it’s also not a given that that helps.

    I guess at least you can just fork libre software if that happens.

    • orclev@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      1 year ago

      That’s exactly the point and it’s happened many times now. OpenOffice got converted to a non-libre license so it was forked to LibreOffice and OpenOffice was left to rot. Audacity fucked around and now there’s like 3 or 4 forks all competing there. That’s the great thing about open source software, if companies or even individual maintainers do something that pisses off the user base enough, someone will come along and fork it. It’s truly democratic as people vote with their feet, or downloads as the case may be.

      • SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        In addition, the work is never fully lost.

        If unity goes to shit, welp, cannot use any of unity’s code at all. Years and years of engine development wasted.

        If some FOSS software goes to shit? That code is still there. Just take it and unshittify it. Little to no work wasted.

    • tabular@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Being licensed as free software (libre) just means users have the freedom to fork and continue without the copyright owner (to the degree permitted by the license).

      The same bad incentives still exist but they are mitigated when devs know competition can sprout out of their bad actions.