The Coalition would cancel offshore wind zones, scrap climate laws for heavy industry and car makers, and attempt to lift the ban on nuclear if it wins power.

Its energy plan formalises a commitment to slow down renewables and jettison several core emissions reductions policies.

The Coalition has urged states to reconsider the ban on nuclear, which it says could be used to power massive expansion of AI data centres across the country.

  • geematic@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    In sure this approach worked well for them before the consequences of climate change started appearing.

    Talking like this on the cusp of this mega El Nino summer is either politically very brave or very foolish.

    ”Australia is a lucky country run mainly by second rate people who share its luck. It lives on other people’s ideas, and, although its ordinary people are adaptable, most of its leaders (in all fields) so lack curiosity about the events that surround them that they are often taken by surprise.”

    • arbilp3@aussie.zoneOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 days ago

      Donald Horne is still pretty spot on when it comes to our mainstream politics bar a few exceptions.

      As to your other comments, I’d say the pollies in question are definitely on the foolish side and only care about power. To drag themselves to PHON level is pretty nausea-making.

  • Mantzy81@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    Ah yes, because Australia is well-known for its hospitable climate and its lack of floods, drought and fires - all things exasperated by a changing climate.

    Fucking dickheads.

    • AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      Well, some say that the droughts and floods are the result of anthropogenic climate change, while others say it is the Almighty punishing us for tolerating gay people and/or violating the Sabbath, so who’s to say who’s right?