Factoring in both short and long term capabilites, which club is less equiped for success? They’re both well under expectations at the moment, but who is more likely to be good in a 2-5 year window?

  • wolfey1991@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    United are in a worse spot , at least chelsea looks like they’ve got an owner that looks like he cares for the club even if he does spend like a drunken sailor

  • Asriel_1985@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    Chelsea seem to be turning a corner to be fair.

    They also have a far better manager so they’ve got that going for them.

  • yesterdaysbreadtoday@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    Well I don’t think that even Chelsea would go 90 mins without scoring against Paul Dummett at centre back so Man United gets my vote for now

    • walliver@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Man City also couldn’t score in 90 minutes against Paul Dummett. Once he’s a regular, Newcastle will be unbeatable.

  • Meu_14@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    Chelsea play well but cant score. United play poorly. Chelsea are full of young players. United are full of players reaching/past their peak. United by a mile. And I’m here for it.

  • jstaobsrvr@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    Manchester United is in the worst position. I think Chelsea has a better chance to improve in the next 2-5 years. As long as the Glazers own the club, I feel like things will only get worse at United.

  • montiel_scores@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    Definitely United. For the most part, Chelsea have played decently and and look to have turned some sort of corner. United are just sad.

  • Double-Reporter-2317@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    United look like us last season even the body language. For us, the effort and body language are healthier but we’re still lacking in results

    • I_like_trains_mkaay@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Yeah id agree with this. If you could actually score goals you’d be closer to the top. We are just shit through and through.

  • Cheeky_Star@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    Both are Shit.

    You’re a Chelsea fan that looking for some words of hope. Both are shit mate.

  • AsepticTechniq@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    Man United for sure. Chelsea is in the middle of a transition period whereas Man United look like they need to start one. Højlund and Garnacho are a bright light for their future though

  • Thorium19@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    Chelsea look like they’re almost starting to work together, they’ve felt like they’re not sure if they can trust their decisions previously but now they’re doing so.

    United on the other hand, look like a bunch of mercenaries pulled together and being expected to play even though they’ve already been paid, instead of getting paid after the job is done.

  • MTG1972@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    Chelsea has hope for this season man utd doesn’t have that that’s the diffrence

  • Bobby_Shafto-@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    “Glaziers out 😭😭😭” Some of these idiots even compare them to Mike Ashley. They have spent 400,000,000+ in the last couple of years on players. Personally, I am hugely enjoying the downfall of both

  • ImVinnie@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    United!

    At least Chelsea’s owners are willing to spend money. Now granted it’s on shit players, but they are at least giving the manager the resources to win.