• Letsdothisagain@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    11 minutes ago

    Yeaaaaahhhh… that tracks, democrats willing to burn everything down and ruin it for everyone if they don’t get their way…

  • infinitesunrise@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    2 hours ago

    Democrats are centrist liberals. They are capitalists. They are cop-loving authoritarians. They will never fulfill your leftist liberatory desires. Stop deferring your political will to wishes they will never manifest. You have Stockholm Syndrome. Go do something yourself that matters to you in your own community.

  • SulaymanF@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Pandora’s box is opened, and once that happens, it’s almost impossible to close it. I’m going to be honest, the next election cycle, I’ll consider voting for the blue equivalent of Trump. Now that we know presidents can act like kings, it’s time progressives capitalized on that. Why not lock up rightwingers and hatemongers, slap tariffs on oil, and deport Zionists?

  • ERROR: UserNotFound@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    4 hours ago

    This is how it looks like:

    Biden: “I need y’all to execute the traitor Donald J. Trump”

    Military: “I’m sorry Mr. President, I’m afraid we cannot do that.”

    Trump: “I need y’all to round up these democrat [n-word] thugs”

    Military: “Can we just shoot them?”

  • Taleya@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Presidential immunity gives a democratic incumbent the right to slap a republican senator daily

  • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    47
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    12 hours ago

    That’s literally the opposite of what the Dem leadership ever does. Expecting them to put the outcomes for regular people over system rules and norms (and their owner donors) is like expecting a sheep to become an obligate carnivore.

    Neoliberals don’t change the system, they ARE the system. You’re not going to get systemic change from someone whose raison d’être is protecting the norms and rules at all costs.

    • Taleya@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Nope.

      Dems try to adhere to The Rules And Procedures

      Pubs don’t give a shit

      • technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Dems try to adhere to The Rules And Procedures

        Tell that to Nancy’s stock portfolio… Or is that “legal”?

        Either way they’re 2 rich 2 resist.

      • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        5 hours ago

        That first part is kinda what I’m saying: Dems adhere to the rules and procedures even when it prevents them from taking completely reasonable actions that the people who they’re supposed to represent want.

        Republicans break all rules and norms to do awful things and Dems refuse to break any rules or norms to stop them.

        It’s like a fistfight where one fighter is wielding a sawed off shotgun and the other refuses to even fight dirty.

        • Taleya@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 hours ago

          Well this is the bitch: you can’t play that game. Because the whole point of that game to smash the rules of order. To destroy the social contract. To create chaos and revoke rights. Any move you make is a win for them and a loss for everyone else.

          Don’t play chess with pigeons

          • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            5 hours ago

            That’s a false dichotomy.

            You’re assuming that the only alternative to slavishly adhering to the rules as determined by people who could not possibly predict today’s circumstances is to ignore the very concept of rules and procedure.

            I’m not advocating for Dems to do either. I’m advocating for them to change the rules for the better when they can and to bend or even outright break them when it’s necessary and justified.

            Following rules for their own sake even when it’s clearly contrary to the needs and wants of the people is just a more socially acceptable form of authoritarianism.

            • Taleya@aussie.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              5 hours ago

              Not assuming a falsity at all - the rules in question are due process

              • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                4 hours ago

                So THAT’S where you want the goal posts now?

                Sure, due process is an inalienable human right that should never be infringed upon.

                That obviously wasn’t what I was talking about, though.

          • ℍ𝕂-𝟞𝟝@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            4 hours ago

            So how it usually plays out is that destroying is usually much easier than building.

            So if the oligarchs destroy the rules, you will not win by trying to rebuild them. You will only get back to some sense of normal by shooting back and making them understand why the rules were there. And I don’t mean threats.

            The moment the office of the president was given complete immunity from everything, Biden should have had Musk shot. More realistically, Dems should have fought judicial appointments the same way as Reps did, and actually appointed activist judges instead of trying and failing to appoing Merrick fucking Garland.

            The eleventh hour of the “system” was prosecuting Trump. That system does not exist anymore, there is nothing to defend at this point.

    • Ledericas@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      11 hours ago

      old guard dems are just GOP in disguise, because they often work together behind the scenes making deals, they both of the same megadonors, additionally they hope to get by being “not-republican” candidates.

  • bdonvr@thelemmy.club
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    49
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    13 hours ago

    lmao what

    you still believe in these fucks?

    System’s broken. We don’t need a different party in charge of the system we need a new system.

    • Ileftreddit@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 hours ago

      This is why Sanders has told new politicians to run as independents, neither of the current parties can be trusted

    • Wilco@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Agreed. The US is over. These people are bouncing the entire stock market up and down using tariffs and doing insider trading on it … there is no justice whatsoever.

    • Katana314@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      5 hours ago

      There are good democrats out there - many of us have met them in person. Just that the leadership, and threats from AIPAC money, twist them into not doing everything they can.

      I wouldn’t be so pessimistic as to say EVERY person in the US looking into politics is corrupt. Just make sure to actually name people when lambasting them, not paint a wide swath.

        • Katana314@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          36 minutes ago

          I’d recommend you take a look at a Zeteo interview of two Congress members who stood against them. It can be more complex than straight bribery.

          https://youtu.be/o_TkExbKbG4

          For one thing, taking money from AIPAC isn’t just about greed; it’s also about using that money to campaign and help people be aware of what issues they’re fighting for. (Yes, I’m aware for some, it’s all about power and greed)

          For another, AIPAC money can become an enemy: These Congress members got an army of mailings demonizing them as soon as they voted against an issue Israel wanted in their corner. They were voted out of office, and never got to pass the causes they wanted for their communities.

          Should they take AIPAC money? Absolutely not. Do I see why they’d take it? Absolutely.

      • bdonvr@thelemmy.club
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        1 hour ago

        There are good democrats out there

        That may be true but isn’t relevant really. A few decent people in a party will not fundamentally change our system.

    • wischi@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Approval voting and more parties could theoretically improve things quite a bit. But switching to approval voting is probably not simple because why should the biggest parties support something that hurts them.

  • Asafum@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    126
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    15 hours ago

    if Democrats ever win I fully exepct this:

    “Now is a time of healing. To better unify our Great Nation™®© we are going to let Republicans fill every committee and pick every judge, we are even looking into how we might let them have the presidency. If we can’t, do not worry, we will behave as if we were Republicans and will do as they wish.”

    • jonne@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Yep, that’s what Obama did with the Bush people and the people that caused the GFC. And now all these people are back for round 2 with nothing learned (well, they learned there are no consequences no matter what they do).

    • takeda@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      13 hours ago

      I think Bernie’s Fight the Oligarchy Tour is changing this, but more people needs to push this.

      • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        edit-2
        6 hours ago

        So is David Hogg, the new Vice Chair of the DNC. He’s a Gen-Z school shooting survivor who’s committed to primary out the centrists and turn them into a real opposition party.

      • jaybone@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        10 hours ago

        Once Newsom is in CECOT he will have plenty of time to think about what he could have done.

    • Wilco@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Yea, the “democrats” will want to “reach across the table” and work with these fucking traitors. Why? Because most of them are likely in on it.

      • jaybone@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        10 hours ago

        They take the same money from the same corporations. They don’t care if they win or lose an election.

  • Carmakazi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    79
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    16 hours ago

    There isn’t going to be another government or another free election until the current regime is put to the sword.

  • BmeBenji@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    14 hours ago

    Sorry, I get the spirit of the meme and it’s nice to daydream but fuck no. I don’t trust the Democrats to do anything in the interest of the people.

    • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      14 hours ago

      It’s not whether you trust one absolutely or not.

      It’s always, as ever, relative. You pick between the options for the best bad option or you abdicate your vote and then must suffer (potentially) the worst of both worlds.

      • BmeBenji@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        14 hours ago

        What I mean is I don’t want the Democrats to go hog wild with the law the same way the Republicans are because they are also owned by the Capitalists. Since I don’t have another choice of course I’m very likely to Vote Blue No Matter Who™️ to my great displeasure, unless a more progressive party takes the lead by a landslide and actually has a good chance of winning

        • lemonaz@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 hours ago

          Ideally they’d take over the Dem party since it would solve multiple problems simultaneously: a relevant progressive party + existing infrastructure + no neoliberal faux-progressive party that would split their vote

  • LeninOnAPrayer@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    10 hours ago

    Is this how liberals fantasize about revolutionary action while still staying as milk toast as possible?

    Edit: I appreciate Lemmy for the simple fact that I can use “liberal” in any sub and not be considered a conservative by default when I’m criticizing that perspective.

      • Deceptichum@quokk.au
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        15 hours ago

        Well you’re fantasising about elections and not lining up republican politicians against the wall or gunning them down as they head to their car after work.

        • Log in | Sign up@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          18
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          14 hours ago

          Yeah, you’re right, your fantasy that you’re never going to do in real life is so much better than that other fantasy that isn’t happening.

          • Deceptichum@quokk.au
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            13 hours ago

            I’m not the one in America.

            Let them enjoy voting Trump out of office next “election” if they don’t want to stand up.

            • Log in | Sign up@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              9 hours ago

              And how many alt right neo nazis have you slain in the street in your own country? I’ve a feeling I would have heard of you if you had.

              • Deceptichum@quokk.au
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                8 hours ago

                Why would I kill them when there’s no threat of them taking over?

                I’ve attended rallies in the past and bashed the fash.